1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IrinaK [193]
3 years ago
5

6. Depth perception, color recognition, and

Law
2 answers:
emmasim [6.3K]3 years ago
7 0
The answer is A!!! Just answered this
Fed [463]3 years ago
6 0
The answer is A. Peripheral
You might be interested in
Someone please help me with this question!!!!
d1i1m1o1n [39]

Answer:

the others are already answered

Explanation:

For general intent, the prosecution need only prove that the defendant intended to do the act in question, whereas proving specific intent would require the prosecution to prove that the defendant intended to bring about a specific consequence through his or her actions, or that he or she perform the action

3 0
2 years ago
If a boy liked you and two other liked you what would you do.
anastassius [24]
Pick the one that’s nicer and if not the. Just pick the cuter one
3 0
3 years ago
In September, Amina hired Bryan as a delivery man. Bryan was to commence work on 1 November. On 1 October, Amina wrote to Bryan
Tcecarenko [31]

Answer: The answer is explained below

Explanation:

A layoff is a termination of an employment at the employer's will. A layoff may be either temporary or permanent and can occur for reasons such as new technology, downsizing, or changes in market conditions. In this case with regards to the question, Amina told Bryan that his service is no longer needed due to an economic circumstances. While accepting and signing a job offer, there are legal agreement which has to be made.

Here,an anticipatory breach occurs when Amina states, in advance of the due date that Bryan was meant to start the job that she intends not fulfilling the agreement of having him as a delivery man.

In this situation, Bryan can't sue Amina because it wasn't her fault that an economic situation arises. If he had left a previous job to take Amina's offer, that could have been a different case.

According to the labour welfare law, in case any employer rejects the job offer the individual can raise a concern against him. An economic conditions can come up anytime so Bryan shouldn't sue Amina.

5 0
3 years ago
Rawls might criticize Locke’s social contract on which of the following grounds?
ratelena [41]

Answer:

a) The parties to the contract know too much about their particular interests and as a result, the terms of the contract are not necessarily fair.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is true about alcohol-attributable deaths?
murzikaleks [220]

Answer:

More males than females tend to die from excessive alcohol use

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Asking questions, recognizing deception, recognizing verbal signals and nonverbal signals,
    10·1 answer
  • During pre-start, the mirror check may involve
    13·2 answers
  • Mr. and Mrs. A, who own a farm, notice that their cows are getting sick. They called
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of something that would be part of a person’s symbolic culture?
    6·2 answers
  • Here we go:
    7·1 answer
  • To become a federal judge, what two things must happen
    8·1 answer
  • How did the pilgrims influence the framers of the constitution?
    10·1 answer
  • Oh, so your a lawyer? name every law
    8·1 answer
  • Enzo has recovered a bullet at a crime scene. He needs help determining what type of gun was used to fire it. What is his BEST r
    11·1 answer
  • Why does the US make a big fuss about the Xinjiang issue but keep silent about its own genocide?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!