Hey there,
![\boxed{\boxed{Federal Judicial}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cboxed%7B%5Cboxed%7BFederal%20Judicial%7D%7D)
: This would be one of the 3 co-equal branches that which help organize under the Federal Government.
![\boxed{\boxed{State \ Judicial}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cboxed%7B%5Cboxed%7BState%20%5C%20Judicial%7D%7D)
: This would be people who enforce the laws in the states. They make them and they have people understand them.
_____________________________________________________________
![(Similarities)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%28Similarities%29%20)
: They both help sustain laws and keep them under control. As the
![(Judicial)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%28Judicial%29)
sustain's the government, the
![(State Judicial)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%28State%20Judicial%29%20)
sustain's the states laws.
Hope this helps.
~Jurgen
Answer:
The laws are old, and we still have rights, but we are looking forward and making new laws.
Explanation:
I'm not really sure though.
<span>Since the decision of the
Speaker of the House, John William McCormack, was to ask the high
chamber member Adam Clayton Powell Jr. not to take an oath, because of
the previous scandal in which Powell had been involved; If
the jury had decided in favor of Speaker McCormack, the way of operating
in the congress would have been questioned, since only one member could
be expelled according to what the constitution says, and not by the
decisions of the speaker. <span>The scope would have been very
large if it failed in McCormack's favor, giving a sense of illegality or
favoritism, and voters would feel that their representatives were not
respected.</span></span>
D. He founded the House of Wisdom to encourage Arabic translation.