Answer:
See explanation below
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, a director of manufacturing must convince management that a proposed manufacturing method reduces costs before the new method can be implemented. The current production method operates with a mean cost of $220 per hour.
a) The alternative and null hypotheses would be:
H0: μ ≥ 220
Ha: μ < 220
b) Comment on the conclusion when H0 cannot be rejected:
When we fail to reject the null hypothesis H0, there is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean cost can be reduced from $220. Therefore the manager's proposed method cannot be implemented.
c) Comment on the conclusion when H0 can be rejected:
When the null hypothesis, H0 is rejected, there is enough evidence to conclude that the mean cost can be reduced from from $220. Therefore the manager's proposed method can be implemented.
PART A
The equation of the parabola in vertex form is given by the formula,

where

is the vertex of the parabola.
We substitute these values to obtain,

The point, (3,6) lies on the parabola.
It must therefore satisfy its equation.




Hence the equation of the parabola in vertex form is

PART B
To obtain the equation of the parabola in standard form, we expand the vertex form of the equation.

This implies that

We expand to obtain,

This will give us,


This equation is now in the form,

where

This is the standard form
The answer is 19.8 to ur problem
P(TeamA) = 0,43
P(Female) = 0,52
P(TeamA and Female) = 0,19
P(TeamA or Female) = ?
P(TeamA or Female) = P(TeamA) + P(Female) - P(TeamA and Female) <=>
P(TeamA or Female) = 0,43 + 0,52 - 0,19 <=>
P(TeamA or Female) = 0,76 or 76%