Answer:
False
Explanation:
A defined benefit pension plan is a type of pension plan where the employer gives a promise with respect to the particular pension payment that could be lumpsum for the retirement basis
Since in the question it is mentioned that the companies would not continue with the defined benefit plan and they move to the defined-contribution plans that save for the retirement so that it would create the more responsibility over the company due to this they would provide the retirement benefit but this statement is false as it is better to received the lumpsum amount
Answer:
The answer is A. cash and short-term investments by daily cash operating expenses
Explanation:
This is calculated as follows:
cash and short-term investments(cash equivalents) ÷ daily cash operating expenses.
Cash equivalents are very short-term securities. They are very liquid and can be converted to cash very quickly. Examples are bank accounts short-term securities like treasury bills.
Days cash on hand is the number of days that a firm can afford to pay its operating expenses, given the amount of cash available.
Answer:
General Motors had more of a Production Orientation
Explanation:
The company which is production oriented focuses on the production and company's production processes and runs campaigns to sell the product produced or the product they are producing. General motors produced the products which it is good in producing the products and won the market against great giants like Ford, Toyota and German auto companies. Whereas Toyota was developing market which is newly born and started pricing their products on the basis of products that were desired (environmentally friendly products) and lost the market because of lost of market share as this market was in introduction phase and Toyota left a market which was at maturity. Then it is obvious that Toyota has revenue losses due to leaving its concentration and marketing of products to mature market and was busy in developing environmentally free products market in US.
Answer: C
Explanation:
This is because although the coupon rate is devoid of federal income tax any market discount is taxed as interest income earned. So so if there is a way that they can be taxed without jeopardizing their basic Federal income tax-free status, why not? The discount can be accreted annually and tax paid, or the tax can be paid at maturity or sale date.
Answer:
The correct answer is option a.
Explanation:
Taxes levied on either buyers or sellers are equivalent. In both cases, the tax creates a wedge. This wedge is the difference between the price that the buyers have to pay and the price that the sellers receive.
The price that the buyers have to pay increases while the price that the sellers receive decreases. But this tax wedge does not depend on whom the tax is levied, it depends on the elasticity of demand and supply. So whether the tax is levied on buyers or sellers, the tax wedge will remain the same.
The tax burden will be shared between both buyers and sellers. So it is incorrect to say that the taxes levied on sellers and taxes levied on buyers are not equivalent.