Answer:
B. Employees who agree to obey employers are not truly abandoning their own responsibility.
Explanation:
This statement contradicts the narrow-view because it is telling us that even if employees obey managers in most, of all cases, employees also have their own, authonomous responsabilities, which, by their own will, they try to fulfill, giving them individual agency outside of direct employer control.
Answer:
Coronado's diluted earnings per share would be 4.53
Explanation:
Net interest savings = (2040000*5%)*(1-0.35)= $66,300
Weighted average common stock outstanding=194000+(2040000/1000*10)= 214,400
Coronado's diluted earnings per share=(906,000+66,300)/214,400= $4.53
Answer:
Adding up basic monthly expenses and subtracting this total from take-home pay, plus trying to find out ways or figuring out what to give up to make the monthly loan payment.
Explanation:
A loan is simply a borrowed money that must be repaid at a certain point in time.
Before taking out a loan, it is better you ask yourself some questions like the reason for the loan collection, how much am i earning and willing to set aside for the loan repayment and will it be monthly and other questions.
Answer:
aesthetic
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the change in color represents the aesthetic aspect of packaging. An aesthetic aspect refers to making sure that the packaging has an overall pleasant, positive, beautiful, or artful appearance in order to evoke positive emotions on the viewer. Which in this scenario is exactly what Feather Tissues Inc. is trying to accomplish by changing the color from red to blue, in order to please/attract their customers and in term increase sales.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. result from the political bias toward immediate benefits and deferred costs.
Explanation:
While many people run hysterically on the streets begging politicians to act in the face of the threat of climate change, many people, young and old, may be demanding the same type of action, but to fix the unfunded passive systems.
By extending eligibility and increasing the benefits of a pay-per-use system while at the same time having fewer children to finance it, previous generations have left a fearsome financial obligation. Either taxes will increase dramatically for tomorrow's workers, lowering their standard of living, or benefits will fall for tomorrow's retirees, lowering their standard of living. A group will feel very angry.
These problems were anticipated even when politicians were raising payments, but each elected government simply kicked the can and allowed things to continue as usual.
Social security systems and pension funds are actuarially not funded systems. There is no obligation for this generation to have children at the same rate as previous generations. Therefore, when those born in the 1950s reach retirement age in the next century, their stipends will feel more like a burden due to the ranks of non-active members of society that will depend on their contributions to live.