False because there are other ways to identify an intercept
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We can use the point-slope form given by:
Where <em>m</em> is the slope and (x₁, y₁) is a point.
So, we will substitute -2 for <em>m</em> and (5, 2) for (x₁, y₁). This gives us:
Simplify:
Distribute:
Add 2 to both sides. Hence, our equation is:
Reliable causal inference based on observational studies is seriously threatened by unmeasured confounding.
What is unmeasured cofounding?
- By definition, an unmeasured confounder is a variable that is connected to both the exposed and the result and could explain the apparent observed link.
- The validity of interpretation in observational studies is threatened by unmeasured confounding. The use of negative control group to reduce unmeasured confounding has grown in acceptance and popularity in recent years.
Although they've been utilised mostly for bias detection, negative controls have a long history in laboratory sciences and epidemiology of ruling out non-causal causes. A pair of negative control exposure and outcome variables can be utilised to non-parametrically determine the average treatment effect (ATE) from observational data that is vulnerable to uncontrolled confounding, according to a recent study by Miao and colleagues.
Reliable causal inference based on observational studies is seriously threatened by unmeasured confounding.
Learn more about unmeasured confounding here:
brainly.com/question/10863424
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer to your questions is: 25 new teachers
Step-by-step explanation:
Data
# of students = 2000
ratio = 3:80 teachers to students
New teachers = ?
Process
I suggest to use rule of three to solve this problem
3 teachers ---------------- 80 students
x ---------------- 2000 students
x = (2000 x 3) / 80 = 75 teachers
Number of initial teachers = 75
The ratio change to 1:20
1 teacher ------------------- 20 students
x ------------------- 2000 students
x = (2000 x 1) / 20
x = 100 teachers
Number of new teachers = 100 - 75 = 25
Answer:
yes totally
Step-by-step explanation:
5a+5b=5a+5b
