Answer:
a. opportunity cost principle, the length of the movie does not matter as long as watching a movie is the best way to spend your time compared to other alternatives.
Explanation:
In the given case since it is mentioned that longer movies would be more better as compared with the shorter movies also the price for the both would be the same so here the opportunity cost principle is applied i.e. the movie length is not relevant here as it is considered to spend your time by watching a movie
So the first option is correct
The answer to this is D. Core Values
Based on the fact that Damien invested $5,000 and left it in an account that earns 6% for 4 years, the investment worth would be b. $6,312.38.
<h3>What would be the value of the investment?</h3>
The value of the investment in 4 years is considered to be its future value when looking at it from the present.
Using the rate being earned, the investment amount, and the number of years the investment will be invested, the future value formula is:
Future value = Investment x ( 1 + rate)^ number of years
Solving gives:
= 5,000 x ( 1 + 0.06) ⁴
= 5,000 x 1.06⁴
= 5,000 x 1.26247696
= $6,312.3848
= $6,312.38
In conclusion, the value of Damien's investment after a period of four years at 6% per year comes to $6,312.38.
Find out more on future value at brainly.com/question/24703884
#SPJ1
Answer:
Total annual cash inflow= $5,000
Explanation:
The total annual cash inflow will be the sum of the savings in operating costs and the incremental contribution from the sale of the bagels.
Annual contribution from Bagel = 1,500×$0.90=1350
Operating cost savings = 3,650
Total annual cash inflow = 1,350 + 3,650 =5,000
Total annual cash inflow= $5,000
Answer: discount on bonds payable
Explanation:
Based on the information given, since the sum of the fair value of the warrants and the face amount of the bonds exceeds the cash proceeds, then the excess will be reported as the discount on bonds payable.
The discount on the bonds payable occurs in a scenario whereby the bonds are issued for a lesser amount than their face or their maturity amount.
The reason for this is when the bonds have a stated interest rate that is smaller than market interest rate for similar bonds.
