1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Firlakuza [10]
3 years ago
11

Your friend remarks that longer movies are a better deal than shorter movies because the ticket price is the same in both cases.

Therefore, the longer movie provides more benefit for the same cost as a shorter movie. Which of the following is the best argument against your friend's claim that longer movies provide more benefit than shorter movies?
Based on the:

a. opportunity cost principle, the length of the movie does not matter as long as watching a movie is the best way to spend your time compared to other alternatives.
b. cost-benefit principle, the benefits of a longer movie exceed the costs when compared to a shorter movie.
c. marginal principle, you should only continue to watch an additional movie if it is shorter than the first movie.
d. interdependence principle, longer movies are affected by the market for shorter movies.
Business
1 answer:
denis23 [38]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

a. opportunity cost principle, the length of the movie does not matter as long as watching a movie is the best way to spend your time compared to other alternatives.

Explanation:

In the given case since it is mentioned that longer movies would be more better as compared with the shorter movies also the price for the both would be the same so here the opportunity cost principle is applied i.e. the movie length is not relevant here as it is considered to spend your time by watching a movie

So the first option is correct

You might be interested in
7g-9 ( 2g + 1 ) = 13
tatiyna
The answer to the question is g=-2

7 0
3 years ago
The management of Omega Manufacturing is implementing a plan to minimize production mistakes by allowing teams that work in each
Whitepunk [10]

Answer: Quality control

 

Explanation: Quality control refers to the process under which an organisation tries to keep the quality of their goods produced as per the market standards. This process is used to keep the customer base rigid and stable or to decrease the production cost by rectifying the errors.

     In the given case, omega is planning to minimize production mistakes by making each department monitoring their performance.

Thus, we can conclude that managers are engaged in quality control.

7 0
3 years ago
When the units produced are equal to the units sold, the net operating income computed using the variable costing method is ____
den301095 [7]

Answer:

equal to

Explanation:

When the units produced are equal to the units sold, net operating income computed using the absorption costing approach is equal to the net operating income computed using the variable costing approach.

5 0
3 years ago
Krysta, who manages the is organization for her company, is continually striving to expand is services and capitalize on the lat
Bess [88]

Based on the goals of the IS organization that Krysta manages, it can be perceived as a business partner or peer.

<h3>What is a business partner or peer?</h3>

This is a business established by a company to help it achieve its goals by engaging in alternative technological developments that will be beneficial to the parent company.

Krysta is managing an organization that helps her company to strive for more excellence which makes this a business partner.

Find out more on business partners at brainly.com/question/25641198.

5 0
3 years ago
Read the Birger v. Tuner case and the Liebman v. Rosenthal case and determine why the court ruled that both contracts were enfor
DIA [1.3K]
I read the summary of these cases, based on what I understand, even though both contracts were based on illegalities, they were still enforceable because they were done under extreme circumstances.

The motive for going into contract was to save the family's well-being. Had the circumstances been favorable for both parties, they would not have agreed on such contract.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you report less than $50,000 in federal payroll tax in a look back period, you must make your tax deposit by what day of the
    13·1 answer
  • You asked two of your friends to give you their opinions of a business proposal you have written. Now you have received two sepa
    11·1 answer
  • Carla Corporation was organized on January 1, 2014. It is authorized to issue 10,000 shares of 8%, $100 par value preferred stoc
    13·1 answer
  • Aragon and Associates has found from past experience that 25% of its services are for cash. The remaining 75% are on credit. An
    13·1 answer
  • Thirty-two new employees from Market Enterprises are attending orientation, receiving information about company policies, and fi
    13·1 answer
  • Currie Company borrowed $30,000 from the Sierra Bank by issuing a 9% three-year note. Currie agreed to repay the principal and i
    11·1 answer
  • TUMI brand briefcases are very expensive, high-end briefcases that are generally sold in specialty luggage shops. Which of the f
    10·1 answer
  • The elasticity coefficient is determined by looking at the percentage change in quantity divided by the percentage change in pri
    7·1 answer
  • Discuss how the problems of what, how and for whom exist​
    13·2 answers
  • Which marketing management philosophy focuses on the question, "what do customers want and need?".
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!