<span>The correct answer is that the conspirators exchange short bursts of one-syllable words, which shows their urgency and fear that the assassination might not succeed. They are obviously afraid, and not talking much, because they are unsure of whether they will make it and kill Caesar in the end. This way of speaking shows their anxiety before the murder has happened, which is why it is the correct answer. The other ones don't make much sense in this case.</span>
Answer:
1. Carrot - We can eat it's root
2. Ginger - We can eat it's stem
3. Onion- We can eat it's root
4. Coriander - We can eat it's leaves
5. Beetroot - We can eat it's root
Answer:
The literary technique used in all three examples is <u>metaphor</u>.
Explanation:
<u>A metaphor is a figure of speech that makes an indirect comparison. </u>Unlike a simile -- a direct comparison --, which uses the support words "as" or "like", a metaphor does not use any support words. It simply states that thing A is thing B, instead of thing A is like thing B. For example:
- Your eyes are like stars. -- simile
- Your eyes are stars. -- metaphor
The purpose of a metaphor is to attribute the characteristics of one thing to another by comparing them, even if in reality they are not similar at all. When I say someone's eyes are stars, I don't mean it literally, of course. I refer to their beautiful brightness.
<u>That is precisely what Douglass does in all three examples in the question. Slavery does not literally have bitter dregs. It is not a dark night. The vessels were not ghosts. Douglass is making these indirect comparisons to attribute characteristics of one thing to the other. On dark nights, we can feel scared, lost, hopeless. By saying slavery is a dark night, Douglass may mean slavery made him feel that way.</u>
Answer:
I would say B. or D. but I need the context of the story to know for sure
To prevent from succeeding.
