How did the approach taken by the United Farm Workers differ from the approach taken by the National Association for the Advance
ment of Colored People? The United Farm Workers were looking for long-term changes in labor policy rather than short-term gains. The United Farm Workers preferred using boycotts to achieve its aims rather than launching legal challenges. The United Farm Workers occasionally used violence rather than solely relying on civil disobedience. The United Farm Workers preferred using protests and symbolic actions rather than lobbying legislatures for favorable laws.
The answer is: The United Farm Workers were looking for long-term changes in labor policy rather than short-term gains.
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People made their move when there is a report regarding discrimination/unfairness based on races or ethnicity. Even though they helped a lot of people from their activities, it only provide short-term gains.
The united states farm workers focused their efforts on electing the representatives that can reconstruct the economic system. Such changes would impacted american labors in the long term.
2 religion maybe highly valued by a noble person 1 being involved with kids might be an common aspect 1 nobleman at times might be out doing an skilled structure of some sort or errand or etc.....
England was only influential in theory because they practiced salutary neglect which means that they didn't bother the colonists as long as the colonies belonged to them and paid taxes. The types of governments depended on who the colony belonged to. Royal colonies listened to the parliament but Charter colonies often did what they wanted. England was influential only up until the point that people were willing to accept.
because they were all going with your so beautiful ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ yieee na na na na na na na na na all day long and the other guy I can do it for you to get home to try it out and the live of the photos of the kids are you feeling