1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
il63 [147K]
3 years ago
6

How did the approach taken by the United Farm Workers differ from the approach taken by the National Association for the Advance

ment of Colored People? The United Farm Workers were looking for long-term changes in labor policy rather than short-term gains. The United Farm Workers preferred using boycotts to achieve its aims rather than launching legal challenges. The United Farm Workers occasionally used violence rather than solely relying on civil disobedience. The United Farm Workers preferred using protests and symbolic actions rather than lobbying legislatures for favorable laws.
History
2 answers:
fomenos3 years ago
7 0
<span> The United Farm Workers were looking for long-term changes in labor policy rather than short-term gains.</span>
motikmotik3 years ago
6 0

The answer is: The United Farm Workers were looking for long-term changes in labor policy rather than short-term gains.

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People made their move when there is a report regarding discrimination/unfairness based on races or ethnicity. Even though they helped a lot of people from their activities, it only provide short-term gains.

The united states farm workers focused their efforts on electing the representatives that can reconstruct the economic system. Such changes would impacted american labors in the long term.

You might be interested in
Charles Darwin believed that behaviors, such as emotional expressions associated with human rage, could be explained by natural
trapecia [35]
The answer is William James
3 0
4 years ago
Dogood comments that the group of people [she] encounters:
butalik [34]

Explanation:

D. IT IS B and C BOTH ARE CORRECT

7 0
3 years ago
What problems led to division of Europe from 1938 to 1939?
Akimi4 [234]

Answer:

The events in Europe that preceded the outbreak of World War II can be divided into two periods.

The first period (1933-1936) was associated with the advent of the NSDAP in Germany, the strengthening of its power, the Nazification of all spheres of life in Germany and the accumulation of internal reserves to prepare for revenge for defeat in the First World War. First of all, it is about the revision of the Versailles Peace Treaty in terms of implementing the course of Adolf Hitler towards achieving military parity with the leading world powers. Already on October 14, 1933, Germany announced the withdrawal from the League of Nations. In January 1935, as a result of a German plebiscite, the Saar, which had previously been under the protectorate of the League of Nations, was returned to Germany, and in March Hitler announced the severance of the Treaty of Versailles and the restoration of universal military service, that is, the creation of a regular army of the Reich - Wehrmacht, including the Luftwaffe. On June 18 of the same year, a German-British naval agreement was concluded. In 1936, the German army entered the demilitarized Rhine region. In the same year, in connection with the Spanish Civil War, the Berlin-Rome axis was created and the Anti-Comintern Pact was signed with Japan.

The second period occurred in 1936-1939, when the leadership of Nazi Germany, without resorting to a direct military confrontation, on the pretext of fighting the communist threat, began to introduce a force component into its foreign policy, constantly forcing Great Britain and France to make concessions and compromise. During these years, Nazi Germany created a bridgehead for the future war: in March 1938, the Anschluss of Austria was carried out; in September 1938 - March 1939, the Czech Republic and Klaipeda Territory were annexed to Germany.

By 1939, two military-political blocs of great powers took shape, in which Britain and France opposed Germany and Italy, to which Japan gravitated. The USSR and the USA took a wait and see attitude, hoping to use the war between these blocks in their interests.

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Please, someone help me!
Vitek1552 [10]
I think the answer is c
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who is a proponet of the U of the policy of the assimilation in the early 1800s
zimovet [89]

.President Jefferson

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • "despite his loss in the election, how did lincoln become the leader of the republican party?"
    12·1 answer
  • England enacted ___that restricted goods coming to the new world to those in British ships .
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following was not a cause of French revolution
    9·1 answer
  • Why was Mary Wollstonecraft important
    12·1 answer
  • The Missouri compromise formed the plan that:
    9·1 answer
  • What were socitry changed by 15th amendment in the late 80s?
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement best summarizes part of the ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden? Regulating interstate commerce is an abuse of power. A s
    10·2 answers
  • How and why did the ancient Chinese change their environment?
    8·1 answer
  • Which best describes the statements related to the origins of humans
    8·2 answers
  • Review the texts linked below to learn more about perspectives on the relationship between the past and the present.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!