Answer:
A mother’s education level has a long-lasting effect on her children. We just celebrated Mother’s Day, recognizing the long list of things mothers do for us – everything from feeding us and caring for us when we are sick, to protecting us from monsters in the closet and cheering us on at our sports events. Education might also hone the skills needed to access and effectively use the health care system. In general, infants born to more educated mothers have lower mortality rates. A new study delves into the specifics, determining on a state-by-state basis the extent to which mothers’ education levels affect their babies’ chances of survival. A mother's education level has a huge, if indirect, effect on the health of her children. Children's educational outcomes—their cognitive skills, grades, and educational attainment—are closely linked to their parents' level of education. This observation, well-supported by years of research, will come as a surprise to no one. Having better-educated parents means a higher household income, which for kids translates into attending better schools, among many other benefits.
Hope this helped you!
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
In the 3rd century BCE the Jews ceased to use the name for two reasons listed below;
1. For the fear of profaning His name and
2. Fear of violating violating the second command - “You shall not take the name of the
LORD [Yahweh] your God in vain.
Answer:
The answer is C. Gave the president and congress very little power.
Explanation:
They did this, this way originally because people were afraid of a strong central government but it made it so the government could not enforce anything.
Answer:
Frederick Douglass
Explanation:
Frederick Douglass (February 14, 1818 - February 20, 1895) He was an American social reformer, abolitionist, orator, writer and statesman. After escaping slavery in Maryland, he became a national leader of the abolitionist movement in Massachusetts and New York, gaining prestige for his oratory and critical writings against slavery. In his time, abolitionists described him as an example of clarity in the arguments against slave owners, indicating that slaves were denied the intellectual capacity to function as independent American citizens. At that time, northerners found it hard to believe that a great speaker had been a slave.
