1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maxonik [38]
3 years ago
14

Would it be legal for congress to allow a territory of the united states to become a full state on condition that its residents

choose a new governor?
Law
1 answer:
dolphi86 [110]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

No, it would not be legal.

Explanation:

It would be a violation of US law if Congress allowed a United States territory to become a complete state on the condition that its residents choose a new governor. This is because the US Federal Congress is prohibited from limiting the independence, sovereignty and management of a state over its territories. Thus, allowing a territory to become a complete state is a way of limiting state political power within that territory, which means that it is illegal.

You might be interested in
Ví dụ về văn bản quy phạm pháp luât
photoshop1234 [79]

Explanation:

what are you saying?

??????

3 0
3 years ago
State two rights of women and children in relationships​
Artyom0805 [142]

Answer:

Rights of women are:

Safe motherhood.

Equal participation in politics and work.

Rights of children are:

Right for food, shelter, education etc.

Right of entertainment.

7 0
3 years ago
Which type of law determines which actions are considered a crime?
algol [13]

Answer:

<em>Criminal law</em>, as distinguished from civil law, is a system of laws concerned with punishment of individuals who commit crimes. Thus, where in a civil case two individuals dispute their rights, a criminal prosecution involves the government deciding whether to punish an individual for either an act or an omission.

Hope it helps!

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Even if a declarant gives a statement to police concerning an alleged crime, that statement could still qualify as non-testimoni
alisha [4.7K]

Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause.

Testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-ITlooks like the kind of testimony that would be offered at trial in aid of prosecution;

-It is made when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no ongoing emergency; and

-The primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to a later criminal prosecution.

The Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution protects the right of a criminal defendant to be confronted by his or her accusers in Court and to cross-examine any testimony that they may offer. The admission of hearsay (an out-of-court statement) – even if admissible under an exception to the rule against hearsay – can be in direct conflict with the right of Confrontation.

On the other hand, “non-testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-It is made primarily for the purpose of assisting police to meet an ongoing emergency; or

-It was made primarily for a purpose other than discovering, establishing or proving past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.

To learn more about Testimony visit here ; brainly.com/question/29244222?referrer=searchResultssearchResults

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
What is considered an important necessity for achieving financial success through legal channels?
maxonik [38]

Settlements or a lawsuit are considered as financial success through legal channels .

<u>Explanation: </u>

The conflict between the individual arises out any disputes involving the monetary aspects will be settled by the court jurisdiction depending upon the nature of the agreement they have made. The settlements may be in the way of property or share in the business or any lawsuit which involves huge financial values.

The court would finalize the quantum of settlements to the individual according to the merits and demerits of the case. One who wins the case will be entitled for the settlement which is a financial success through legal aspects. The period of the settlement will be 30 to 90 days as directed by the court but normally it will be around 60 days.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Discuss what changes you think typical
    7·1 answer
  • If a road has no sidewalks pedestrians must walk
    10·2 answers
  • Which generation featured kids who were largely unsupervised by their parents?
    7·1 answer
  • Proposed 28th amendment to the united states constitution that
    7·1 answer
  • Multiple Choice
    13·1 answer
  • How can decisions projects campaigns and events support victims of Human Rights violation​
    5·1 answer
  • The shift from periodic social drinking to substance abuse evolves to meet a person's need for comfort and esteem.
    11·1 answer
  • 11. The Bill of Rights was created because the Anti-Federalists were concerned that
    11·1 answer
  • The Legislative Branch of the United States is NOT entrusted with which of the powers listed below?
    13·1 answer
  • List four types of work that attorneys may do for client
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!