1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vichka [17]
3 years ago
15

2.what was the "most powerful family" in Europe for hundreds of year-

History
1 answer:
kondaur [170]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Rothschild Family

Explanation:

Rothschild Family — The Most Powerful Family in The Finacial World. The Rothschild family was Jewish and lived in Frankfurt (Germany). The beginning of the Rothschild empire began in the 18th century by Mayer Amschel Rothschild.

You might be interested in
Legend says emperor Nero played a fiddle miles away from rome while the city
Komok [63]
What. but I think it's true
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on the following statements, which European policy is described?
fiasKO [112]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Right and first answer gets brainliest answer!​
nikitadnepr [17]
The answer would have to be the third option
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in
Otrada [13]

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

5 0
3 years ago
8. Do you believe tlſe United States, throughout its history, followed Washington's 3 pieces
mixer [17]
This is something that you need your opinion on! But the question is talking about Washington’s farewell address which is right below

In his farewell Presidential address, George Washington advised American citizens to view themselves as a cohesive unit and avoid political parties and issued a special warning to be wary of attachments and entanglements with other nations.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the united states go to war with the Britain in 1812
    15·1 answer
  • Why did president Theodore Roosevelt use the corollary in the Dominican Republic?
    5·1 answer
  • what was lucky for the United State during the attack and what impact did it have on the rest of the war?
    8·1 answer
  • Why do you think Gabaldon was reprimanded at first for bringing prisoners back to camp?
    7·1 answer
  • Which words and phrases show that the passage is a reliable source?
    6·1 answer
  • Argarian societies were based around?
    5·1 answer
  • A person with a "green card" can do all of these EXCEPT A) hold a legal job. B) marry a noncitizen. C) buy health insurance. D)
    13·2 answers
  • Part A<br> What does the Declaration of Independence say about rights?
    14·1 answer
  • NO LINKS PLSS!!!
    14·1 answer
  • SOMEONE PLEASEEEEE HELP I REALLLY NEED THIS
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!