Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The impact of corruption and fraud on an individual is numerous, whether it is coming from a company or a state.
Usually, the impact of corruption and fraud on individuals makes such individuals have a wrong perception of the situation.
If the individual is at the wrong end of corruption and fraud, such individual would miss many opportunities, including access to employment, good health care systems, be exposed to the inefficient quality of standard of living, and many more. Hence, such an individual would believe that little to nothing works in his immediate environment.
In the same vein, if such an individual is gaining from fraud and corruption, he would believe the situations are right for him, and that it is perfectly normal to cheat, lie, and bribe his way through to success. Hence, such an individual would see the world as the best fraudster or most corrupt rules the world and it would be a normal thing to him.
Answer: Option (c) is correct.
Explanation:
Correct option: The demand facing the firm is downward-sloping because it is the market demand.
In a monopoly market conditions, there is a single seller in the market and the monopolist firm is price setter. But the demand curve faced by the monopoly firm is downward sloping because monopolist is a single firm who is operating in the market and there is a need to reduce prices if he wants to sell an additional units.
It is easier to stick to a budget if you can spend some money on things you enjoy.
Explanation
I think your question missed of key information for question 2, so I just answer question at my best for helping you.
Debit Credit
11-Oct
Treasury 292400
Cash 292400
<em>Being own shares repurchased
</em>
1-Nov
Cash (1,450 × 49) 71,050
Treasury Stock (1,450 × 43) 62,350
Paid-in Capital from Sale of Treasury Stock 9,700
<em>To record the sale of treasury stock. </em>
November 25
Cash (5350 × 38) 203,300
Paid-in Capital from Sale of Treasury Stock 9,700
Retained Earnings 17,050
Treasury Stock (5350 × 43) 230,050
<em>To record the sale of the remaining treasury shares </em>
Answer:
<h2>In the context of Consumer Theory or Indifference Curve involving two goods,the opportunity of any one good is computed by how much of the other good is foregone or sacrificed to purchase one more unit of that particular good.</h2>
Explanation:
- In this instance,when Bill's diner consumes 35 burgers and 25 hotdogs,its opportunity cost of additional hot dog=
.Therefore,initially Bill diner's opportunity cost of an additional hot dog is 1.4 units of burger.
- Now,when Bill's diner chooses to consume a combination of 25 burgers and 65 hot dogs,its opportunity cost of additional hot dogs=
approximately.Hence,Bill's diner is willing to sacrifice approximately 0.385 units of burger to consume an additional unit of hot dog. - Now,due to the change in consumption combination,the change in opportunity cost of additional hot dog=
units of burger.Notice,that here the opportunity cost of additional hot dog decreased from 1.4 units of burger to 0.385 units of burger as Bill's diner changed the consumption combination of both burgers and hot dogs.
