All categories

2 years ago

Economic Order Quantity computes:

Business

1 answer:

Mamont248 [21]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

D: Optimum Order size

Explanation:

Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) is a formula applied in logistic and supply chain management to calculate a business's ideal order size. As the name suggests, the order EOQ provides an order quantity that makes economic sense.

Economies of scale suggest that a bigger order size is better because the business will save transport costs. However, ordering in large quantities increases the cost of holding stock. The economic order quantity strikes a balance between these two important factors.

You might be interested in

Typical Corp. reported a deferred tax liability of $6,000,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017, when the tax rate was 40%. T

Alex_Xolod [135]

Answer:

Income tax expense (Balancing figure) $13,200,000

To Deferred tax liability (8% × $15,000,000) $1,200,000

To Income tax payable ($30,000,000 × 40%) $12,000,000

(Being the income tax expense is recorded)

Explanation:

The compound journal entry is shown below:

Income tax expense (Balancing figure) $13,200,000

To Deferred tax liability (8% × $15,000,000) $1,200,000

To Income tax payable ($30,000,000 × 40%) $12,000,000

(Being the income tax expense is recorded)

For recording this, we debited the income tax expense as it increased the expenses and at the same time it also increased the liabilities i.e deferred tax liability and income tax payable so it would be credited

6 0

2 years ago

Mr. and Mrs. Pitt filed a joint tax return in 2017. The couple divorced in 2018. The IRS audited their 2017 return and determine

AURORKA [14]

Answer:

C. Because the couple is divorced, the IRS must apportion the deficiency between Mr. and Mrs. Pitt based on their relative contribution to their 2015 taxable income.

Explanation:

Because Mr and Mrs Pitt filed for a joint tax return in 2017 and got divorced in 2018 and IRS audited their tax return and found that they both underpaid their tax, the IRS must apportion the deficiency 50-50 between both of them based on their separate returns.

3 0

3 years ago

Suppose that five years ago you borrowed $300,000 using a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage with an annual interest rate of 10% with m

Elenna [48]

Answer:

Please check the explanation below.

Explanation:

Rate of Interest =10% or 0.83% monthly

Monthly Payment under this plan=PMT(0.0083, 360, 300000) =$2,632.71

Loan outstanding after 5 years of payments =$289,723

New Interest Rate =8.5% or 0.7083% monthly

Balance Tenure= 25 years

New Monthly Installment =PMT(0.007083,300,289723) =$2,332.93

Monthly savings in installment reduction =$2,632.71 - 2,332.93 =$299.78

a. Net present value of refinancing = -0.05x289,723 + 299.78x{(1-(1+0.007083)-300)/0.007083}

= -14,486.15 + 299.78x124.1886

= -14,486.15 + 37,229.25

= 22,743.10

b. With new monthly installment, balance outstanding at the end of 8th year =$278,258

Net Present Value of Refinance = -0.05x289,723 + 299.78x{(1-(1+0.007083)-36)/0.007083}

= -14,486.15 + 299.78x31.68

= -14,486.15 + 9,446.46

= -4,989.68

c. For refinance loan to have net present value positive, let n payments are required,

NPV = -0.05x289,723 + 299.78x{(1-(1+0.007083)-n)/0.007083}

14,486.15 = 299.78x{(1-(1+0.007083)-n)/0.007083}

14,486.15x0.00783/299.78 =(1-(1.007083)-n)

0.3423 = 1-(1.007083)-n

(1.007083)-n = 0.6577

(1.007083)n = 1.5204

Taking Log both sides,

n = log(1.5204)/log(1.007083)

n = 59.36

Hence, he would need to make 60 payments for making NPV of refinance as zero.

3 0

2 years ago

You can buy property today for $2.2 million and sell it in 5 years for $3.2 million. (You earn no rental income on the property.

Stolb23 [73]

Answer:

PV of the sales price $1,986,948.23

Explanation:

We will calcualte the present value of the sale price using the present value of a lump sum formula:

$\frac{Maturity}{(1 + rate)^{time} } = PV$

Maturity 3,200,000

time 5 years

rate 10% = 10/100 = 0.1

$\frac{3200000}{(1 + 0.1)^{5} } = PV$

PV $1,986,948.2338

This indicates the 3,200,000 in five years are equivalent to 1,986,948.23 dollars Thus, this investment is not profitable as the property will be purchased at 2,200,000

7 0

2 years ago

_______________ ensures that all relevant financial information is reported. (select an option)

Wewaii [24]

Answer:

B. Full disclosure principle

Explanation:

Full disclosure principle ensures that all relevant financial information is reported

7 0

2 years ago