Looking for information in newspapers, magazines, and reference materials and judging its accuracy
voting in local, state, and national elections
participating in a political discussion
trying to persuade someone to vote a certain way
signing a petition
wearing a button or putting a sticker on the car
writing letters to elected representatives
contributing money to a party or candidate
attending meetings to gain information, discuss issues, or lend support
campaigning for a candidate
lobbying for laws that are of special interest
demonstrating through marches, boycotts, sit-ins, or other forms of protest
serving as a juror
running for office
holding public office
serving the country through military or other service
disobeying laws and taking the consequences to demonstrate that a law or policy is unjust
Answer:
World War II and Korea. On August 8, 1945, during the final days of World War II, the Soviet Union declared war against Japan and launched an invasion of Manchuria and Korea. ... The Japanese surrender and the Soviet landing on the Korean Peninsula totally altered the history of contemporary Korea.
Explanation:
The Warsaw Pact united the countries of the socialist bloc in post-WWII military alliance.
World War II was won by the United States and the Soviet Union, but both countries were opposed to ending conflict with Nazi Germany. The United States was a champion of the capitalist ideology, which spreads ideologically throughout the world. It was already Soviet Union since the Russian Revolution in 1917 of socialism. How two ideologies clashed with the end of the war, polarizing the world between capitalists and communists. The clash between the two World War II-winning powers occurs only at the ideological level, because it has the necessary weapons and conditions to destroy one another. Fear and the prevention of a new conflict of extreme proportions creates a climate of tension in the world that prevents direct confrontation, begun as well as the Cold War.
One of the key ideas of laissez-fair policies was that the government--both state and federal--would play an absolutely minimal role in the economic affairs of the public, since these people believed that government intervention hurt productivity.
