Answer:
i would have to say C. hope this helps :)
Explanation:
Many people were concerned about many different things depending if you were wealthy, poor, Jewish or Russian.
The disillusionment of advertisers with
such programming was a major hurdle to the continuance of creating
programming in the television in 1950s.
To add, <span>one of the most popular products in the 1950s was the TV, and at the
start of the decade, there were about 3 million TV owners.</span>
Answer: A. a disagreement between the states over representation in Congress.
The main disagreement was over whether representation would be the same for all states, or based on a state's population size. Then there was also a question, for basing representation on population size, about whether slaves counted in a state's population or not.
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise were worked out during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787 in order to resolve these issues.
- The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. Initially, a unicameral (one-chamber) legislature was envisioned. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
- The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
Answer:
popular support for the Union was strong in England.
Explanation:
Britain took a neutral stand during the civil war in the United States of America. Although a small British private interest supported Confederacy by supplying ammunition in exchange for cotton. But overall conditions signifies that Britain actually supported the Union efforts. The trade with Confederate states was declined by 90 percent. The hopes of British intervention by the Confederate remained a mere hope as Britain never recognized it as a nation nor it signed any treaty with it. Moreover, the British interest of trade was better supported by Unionism than by dividing it and the stakes for intervention were high.
