Answer:
Binge eating disorder
Explanation:
This is a situation in which a person consumes abnormally large food in one meal and are unable to control it.It occurs mostly in adolescents.It involves eating fast and eating lots of food due to anxiety and depression most of the time. A person is said to be binge eat when it occurs at least once a week for 3 months. It is an expressive psychological disorder which is genetic in almost half of patients.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide any options, we can say that the ethical standard that waiting to propose the study violates is "Informed Consent to Research."
In this case, Professor Hammond, first, had to inform the students about the study she was doing so the students were aware of this situation is class. So once she notified the class about her research, then ask them their consent to participate in the study. They probably had to sign a document that serves as an agreement of their participation. The students then would be aware of the details of the research and they would decide if they want to be part of the study. That is the ethical way to proceed.
The distinction between flexible and fixed individual differences is that managers have little or no impact on fixed differences. Fixed differences in this case are often differences where the person who exhibits a certain characteristic is also the person who won't be changing them so soon. And this is a thing where managers have little say over it.
Answer:
citric acid cycle intermediates
Explanation:
Many citric acid cycle intermediates can be siphoned off and thus can be used to generate the amino acids. The intermediates which can provide carbon skeletons for the synthesis of the amino acids are oxaloacetate which helps in the formation of aspartate as well as asparagine; and alpha-ketoglutarate which helps in the formation of the glutamine, proline, as well as arginine.
The term “sense of ownership” is frequently cited as a significant characteristic of community development. While there is increasing use of the terms ownership or sense of ownership, there is a paucity of research regarding what these terms mean, how this body of knowledge influences community development, and the various approaches that can be applied in contemporary community research and practice. A sense of ownership in community development is described as a concept through which to assess whose voice is heard, who has influence over decisions, and who is affected by the process and outcome. Applying the concept of ownership can determine how the strategic interests and actions of individuals or organizations contribute to community development efforts. In addition, the potential for ownership can be understood in part by examining the capacity for and quality of trust. Implications are discussed regarding how the concept of ownership advances the current field, specifically regarding community development research and practice.
