1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ostrovityanka [42]
3 years ago
14

If the Ricardian equivalence theorem LOADING... is not​ relevant, then an​ income-tax-rate cut A. will result in a multiple time

s higher increase in equilibrium real GDP in the long​ run; however, a​ tax-rate reduction will increase the​ automatic-stabilizer properties of the tax​ system, so equilibrium real GDP would be more stable. B. will result in a multiple times higher decrease in equilibrium real GDP in the long​ run, however; a​ tax-rate reduction will reduce the​ automatic-stabilizer properties of the tax​ system, so equilibrium real GDP would be more stable. C. will result in a multiple times higher increase in equilibrium real GDP in the short​ run; however, a​ tax-rate reduction will reduce the​ automatic-stabilizer properties of the tax​ system, so equilibrium real GDP would be less stable. D. will result in a multiple times higher decrease in equilibrium real GDP in the short​ run; however, a​ tax-rate reduction will increase the​ automatic-stabilizer properties of the tax​ system, so equilibrium real GDP would be less stable.
Business
1 answer:
LenKa [72]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The correct answer is D. will result in a multiple times higher decrease in equilibrium real GDP in the short​ run; however, a​ tax-rate reduction will increase the​ automatic-stabilizer properties of the tax​ system, so equilibrium real GDP would be less stable.

Explanation:

Ricardian Equivalence is an economic theory that suggests that when a government increases expenses financed with debt to try to stimulate demand, demand does not really undergo any change.

This is because increases in the public deficit will lead to higher taxes in the future. To keep their consumption pattern stable, taxpayers will reduce consumption and increase their savings in order to offset the cost of this future tax increase.

If taxpayers reduce their consumption and increase their savings by the same amount as the debt to be returned by the government, there is no effect on aggregate demand.

The fundamental concept of Ricardian equivalence is that it does not matter which method the government chooses to increase spending, whether by issuing public debt or through taxes (applying an expansive fiscal policy), the result will be the same and demand will remain unchanged.

You might be interested in
These are four points from a presentation on the Great Depression:
kolezko [41]
c. history of the Great Depression
3 0
3 years ago
A developer purchased two 135-front-foot lots for $22,900 net each and divided them into three lots of equal front footage. The
uranmaximum [27]
Answer should be &169.63
7 0
3 years ago
Angela is a project manager who leads a curriculum project. She is creating an outline of what each team member needs to complet
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

Planning

Explanation:

Project planning refers to all you do to set up a successful project. It's the process you're going through to set the steps needed to define your project goals, clarify the scope of what needs to be done and develop the task list to do that.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
8-year bonds a year ago at a coupon rate of 8 percent. The bonds make semiannual payments and have a par value of $1,000. If the
nexus9112 [7]

Answer:

Current price of bond is $1060.47

Explanation:

Coupon payment = 1000 x 8% = $80 yearly = 80/2 = $40 semiannually

Number of periods = n = 8 years x 2 periods per year = 16

Yield to maturity = 7% yearly = 7% / 2 = 3.5%

Price of bond is the present value of future cash flows, to calculate Price of the bond use following formula:

Price of the Bond = C x [ ( 1 - ( 1 + r )^-n ) / r ] + [ F / ( 1 + r )^n ]

Price of the Bond =$80 x [ ( 1 - ( 1 + 3.5% )^-16 ) / 3.5% ] + [ $1,000 / ( 1 + 3.5% )^16 ]

Price of the Bond = $80 x [ ( 1 - ( 1.035 )^-16 ) / 0.035 ] + [ $1,000 / ( 1.035 )^16 ]

Price of the Bond = $483.76 + $576.71

Price of the Bond = $1,060.47

7 0
3 years ago
Stewart Parnell, the former CEO of the now-bankrupt Peanut Corporation of America, was charged with falsifying food safety repor
tekilochka [14]

Answer:

C. That Mr. Parnell knew that the product was contaminated before shipment occurred

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Payback Period Jan Booth is considering investing in either a storage facility or a car wash facility. Both projects have a five
    8·1 answer
  • Grace wants to be an astronaut. Which of the following goals would be appropriate for her? I want to be an astronaut by age 30.
    14·2 answers
  • Which of these statements about processes is not​ true?
    6·1 answer
  • Wilton, Inc. had net sales in 2017 of $1,400,000. At December 31, 2017, before adjusting entries, the balances in selected accou
    12·1 answer
  • What is moral hazard? It refers to the actions people take before they enter into a transaction so as to mislead the other party
    9·1 answer
  • If you are falling behind on your student loan payments, which of the following steps should you take to avoid default?
    5·2 answers
  • In the books of seller, ____ is deducted from the invoice price when the buyer pays earlier or on the date/term stipulated
    7·1 answer
  • Explain the differences in operating incomes obtained in requirements 1 and 2. The difference in operating income under absorpti
    12·1 answer
  • A. Suppose there is a surge in consumer confidence that creates an increase in aggregate demand in the economy. The Federal Rese
    14·1 answer
  • Which tools allow economists to determine if the allocation of resources determined by free markets is desirable?.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!