Answer:
$3.12
Explanation:
For expansion:
EBT = EBIT - Interest
= [6,000 + (30% × 6,000)] - $0
= $7,800
Net income = EBT - Tax
= $7,800 - $0
= $7,800
Earning per share for the case of strong expansion period before any debt is issued:
= Net income ÷ Number of shares outstanding
= $7,800 ÷ 2,500
= $3.12
Solution :
Expected sales = current sales x (1 + projected sale next year increase)
= 5,700 x (1 + 15%)
= $ 6555
Expected cost = current cost x (1 + projected sale next year increase)
= 4200 x (1 + 15%)
= $ 4830
Taxable income = 1500 x ( 1 + 15%)
= $ 1725
Taxes (34%) = 510 x (1+15%)
= $ 586.5
Net income = sales - cost - taxes
= 6555 - 4830 - 586.5
= $ 1138.5
Calculation of total asset :
Current asset = 3,900 x 1.15
= $ 4485
Fixed asset = 8100 x 1.15
= $ 9315
Total asset = 4485 + 9315
= $ 13800
Calculation of total liabilities
Current liabilities = 2200 x 1.15
= $ 2530
Long term debt = $ 3,750
Equity = $ 6050 + (1138.5 x 0.50 )
= $ 7189
Total liabilities = $ 2530 + $ 3,750 + $ 7189
= $ 13, 469
Therefore the external financial needed is = $ 13800 - $ 13, 469
= $ 331
Answer:
The yearly depreciation on the asset is $56,111.11
Explanation:
In calculating the right-of-use asset on a lease,the present of value of future cash payments,that is lease liability amount is added to any lease payments paid on or before commencement of lease agreement,direct initial costs,as well as with any likely amount to be incurred in restoring asset's site or dismantling the asset after usage.
In this case,only present value of future cash flows is available,hence that is the amount of right-of-use to depreciated over nine year period.
Depreciation=$505000/9years
=$56111.11
Answer:
A per se violation
Explanation:
A per se violation is one that violates antitrust laws for example agreements made that violates the Sherman antitrust act. It has adverse effects on the competitiveness of a market.
Sherman antitrust act of 1980 is aimed at regulating competitiveness in a market. It prohibits anticompetitive agreements, and unilateral activities that tries to monopolize a market.
In this scenario Omega corporation and precision products, inc., are the principal suppliers of their product in their market. They make an agreement that one will focus on retailers and the other on wholesalers.
This is an attempt to monopolize the market by the two principal suppliers, and is a violation of the Sherman antitrust act.
Answer:
C). green marketing.
Explanation:
Green marketing can be regarded as the marketing of products/services which are presumed as an environmentally safe products. It involves range if activities such as modifications of products, change in process of production, modifications of advertisement as well as sustainability packaging of products. It should be noted that Specific development, pricing, promotion, and distribution of products that do less harm to the environment are known as green marketing