1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
posledela
4 years ago
7

Identify each statement as biased or credible. "When I visited the British Museum, I realized how wrong I was about the reign of

Julius Caesar. I have now reworked my ideas on this topic." —a statement made by a history student "I personally feel that Alexander the Great did nothing to deserve that title of greatness. Eventually, his pride caused him to fail." —from an article written by a historian "I believe that the Zhou dynasty in China should have ended long ago. The cruel emperors had no right to rule our country for so long." —a statement made during a historical debate "Hi. I have started this blog to share my views on famous historical figures. Feel free to let me know what you personally think about these famous people." —a quotation taken from a history blog
History
2 answers:
kogti [31]4 years ago
7 0

Identify each statement as biased or credible.

Biased:  I personally feel that Alexander the Great did nothing…”

Biased:  Hi.  I have started this blog to share MY views…


Credible:  When I visited the British Museum, I realized how wrong I was about Julius Caesar.

Credible: I believe that the Zhou dynasty in China should have ended long ago.  


This answer was marked correct on Plato.

12345 [234]4 years ago
3 0
<span>Credible, because a historian student could have some idea on different topics, and then discover new information that eventually led the student to rethink their ideas. In particular, the sentence is credible because it is possible to admire several pieces in the British Museum related to Julio Ceasar.
---
Biased. The sentence, while could be absolutely written by a historical scholar, should not be included in an article, unless the article is an essay where the scholar expresses an opinion, and even then it should be justified and not simply stated as it appears here.
---
Biased. The sentence seems more probable to be said during a personal conversation of some sort, considering the personal tone of the statement, and the fact that is made considering only the speaker's viewpoint without any evidence to support the claim. 
---
Credible. While the sentence sure is not the best from an academic viewpoint, in a blog it is not usual to use a form of expression that is less codified than what is used in scholars papers. Moreover, it is credible that a historical blogger could want to engage its readers in that way, thus making the statement credible.</span>
You might be interested in
What is one water conservation policy in California? City water districts charge more to residents who use less water. Residents
cestrela7 [59]

Answer:

Only water-efficient appliances are sold in stores.

Explanation:

One water conservation policy in California is;

Only water-efficient appliances are sold in stores

From the choices given, this appears to be the most correct alternative.

I hope this helps.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Amendments Four through Eight deal with rights of
alexandr402 [8]
1-d
2-b
3-c
4-c
5-b
6-b
7-d
8-c
9-d
10-a

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why Is there's are Need to Conserve Bio-diversity ? ​
Arisa [49]

Answer:

Biodiversity conservation protects plant, animal, microbial and genetic resources for food production, agriculture, and ecosystem functions such as fertilizing the soil, recycling nutrients, regulating pests and disease, controlling erosion, and pollinating crops and trees.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who did U.S. officials determine was behind the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001?
Marat540 [252]
O Osama bin laden’S al quesadilla network
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What role did Teddy Roosevelt's Rough Riders
Blababa [14]

Answer:

<u>A. They helped win the Battle of Santiago  in Cuba.</u>

Explanation:

After the Spanish naval force was practically destroyed near Santiago de Cuba the U.S. Navy was recognized as one of the leaders in the world after this battle. But the Americans were reminded of the disorganization and low accuracy of firing at the beginning of the battle. The victory of the US forces succeeded in winning only because of the apparent superiority of the human forces and the almost complete lack of military training of the Spanish fleet.

A few days later the bombing of Santiago began. Among those who had the main in the siege where the Rough Riders. After the strong siege the city surrendered. In total, 24,000 Spanish soldiers surrendered in the south of the island. As early as August, the US military, along with the Cuban rebels, had completely captured Cuba.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • __________ are the limits on government so that people can freely exercise their rights.
    15·1 answer
  • What is the definition of yin yang
    15·2 answers
  • Explain what you think would happen if we didn't have government. No leaders, no laws, no freedoms, no citizenship.
    8·1 answer
  • Author of Source C, Mike Lane, is a political cartoonist who worked from 1972-2009. Lane's cartoons usually attacked political g
    8·1 answer
  • T object]user: colonists enjoyed rights under which documents following the glorious revolution of 1688? british bill of rights
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes one similarity between the Six-Day War and the Yom Kippur War?
    6·1 answer
  • EC Resutls Compared To The Popular Vote
    13·1 answer
  • 7. The educational innovation of the Renaissance humanists was the
    12·1 answer
  • Which of these did not lead to the war of 1812?
    11·1 answer
  • How was Catherine the great affected by wars within her country
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!