1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
posledela
3 years ago
7

Identify each statement as biased or credible. "When I visited the British Museum, I realized how wrong I was about the reign of

Julius Caesar. I have now reworked my ideas on this topic." —a statement made by a history student "I personally feel that Alexander the Great did nothing to deserve that title of greatness. Eventually, his pride caused him to fail." —from an article written by a historian "I believe that the Zhou dynasty in China should have ended long ago. The cruel emperors had no right to rule our country for so long." —a statement made during a historical debate "Hi. I have started this blog to share my views on famous historical figures. Feel free to let me know what you personally think about these famous people." —a quotation taken from a history blog
History
2 answers:
kogti [31]3 years ago
7 0

Identify each statement as biased or credible.

Biased:  I personally feel that Alexander the Great did nothing…”

Biased:  Hi.  I have started this blog to share MY views…


Credible:  When I visited the British Museum, I realized how wrong I was about Julius Caesar.

Credible: I believe that the Zhou dynasty in China should have ended long ago.  


This answer was marked correct on Plato.

12345 [234]3 years ago
3 0
<span>Credible, because a historian student could have some idea on different topics, and then discover new information that eventually led the student to rethink their ideas. In particular, the sentence is credible because it is possible to admire several pieces in the British Museum related to Julio Ceasar.
---
Biased. The sentence, while could be absolutely written by a historical scholar, should not be included in an article, unless the article is an essay where the scholar expresses an opinion, and even then it should be justified and not simply stated as it appears here.
---
Biased. The sentence seems more probable to be said during a personal conversation of some sort, considering the personal tone of the statement, and the fact that is made considering only the speaker's viewpoint without any evidence to support the claim. 
---
Credible. While the sentence sure is not the best from an academic viewpoint, in a blog it is not usual to use a form of expression that is less codified than what is used in scholars papers. Moreover, it is credible that a historical blogger could want to engage its readers in that way, thus making the statement credible.</span>
You might be interested in
Why did the Southern states believe they had the right to secede from the
Readme [11.4K]
It would be c) or d) hope this helps
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5. Which of the following statements about the 1898 Treaty of Paris is NOT correct?
Brut [27]

Answer:

I vote for 'c'..good luck

6 0
2 years ago
I need hellppp plzzzz
Sholpan [36]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Under the Articles of Confederation, representatives needed __________________ agreement to change something, and we know that g
lesantik [10]

Answer:

Every or all the thirteen states

Explanation:

In the United States, following the War of Independence, the Americans came together to form the Articles of Confederation in 1777 among the thirteen states.

In it, there was no executive branch, no judiciary branch, and each colony has one vote each. To pass a law requires 9 of 13, while to change articles requires all the states to give consent.

Hence, Under the Articles of Confederation, representatives needed ALL THE 13 STATES agreement to change something, and we know that getting everyone to agree is really difficult.

3 0
3 years ago
Two effects of allied bombing raids on Japan?
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

Explanation:

Bombing had a greater effect on Japan because most of the buildings were made of wood and the cities were totally destroyed by fire.  The two atomic bombs each totally destroyed a cities. And it destroyed millions and killed millions.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who invaded constantinople in 1453? arab muslim armies ottoman turk armies roman catholic armies eastern orthodox armies?
    10·1 answer
  • How did anti-Semitism develop in the Christian world, from the early days of Christianity in Rome through the 18th century?
    6·1 answer
  • Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution describes what kind of congressional powers?
    15·1 answer
  • N
    12·2 answers
  • I will give out the brain thing and extra points, image below.
    13·2 answers
  • The U.S. providing aid to another country after a natural disaster like a
    15·1 answer
  • Thank you for taking time to consider how these reforms will impact the Soviet-US relationship. I think you will be pleased to s
    10·1 answer
  • In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court rule that the Florida
    6·2 answers
  • Help i will mark brainliest
    9·2 answers
  • How did confucius view the class distinctions that existed in chinese society?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!