Advantage---Loose constructionists tend to uphold civil rights and liberties. Judicially active, loose constructionist judges such as Ruth Bader Ginsburg tend to dissent in cases which infringe civil liberties such as Salinas v Texas (2013) and agree with rulings that don't e.g. 2015 Same sex rulingAdvantage---Loose constructionists often protect minorities, especially those incompatible with Congress or the executive. This is because loose constructionists are not scared to overturn laws or actions made by Congress or the executive e.g. Brown v Board of EducationDisadvantage---Loose constructionists tend to be judicially active, which has fuelled arguments on the politicisation of the Court. They 'legislate from the bench' by striking down laws as unconstitutional. This is undemocratic and elitist, as they have mandate from the electorateDisadvantage---Loose constructionists tend to be too sensitive to public opinion, which could hamper the neutrality and independence of the Court. However, some public support is necessary to maintain the authority of the Court.
It lessened the power a king had over his kingdom. They set a limit on the amount of taxes the king could raise. Also it held the king responsible for his actions if he committed a crime like anyone in his kingdom did. He would be punished for his actions just as commoners would be. They have the same rights as anyone else does. HOPE THIS HELPS!:) <span />
They have to be a natural born citizen, be at least 35 years old and lived in the use for 14 years.
Answer:
They realized how blessed they were to be at peace and to not be involved in the war in Europe.