Answer: B. One asset would increase $1,750 and a different asset would decrease $1,750, causing no effect
Explanation:
From the information given in the question, the journal entry at the time of sales will be represented as:
Debit Accounts receivable $1,750
Credit Sales $1750
Now, when the credit receipt is received as illustrated in the question, the journal entry will be:
Debit Cash $1,750
Credit Accounts receivable $1,750
Therefore, one asset would increase $1,750 and a different asset would decrease $1,750, causing no effect.
The correct option is B.
Answer:
Net income= $98,200
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Division A:
The contribution margin of $79,300
Division B:
Contribution margin of $126,200.
The total traceable fixed costs are $72,400 and total common fixed costs are $34,900.
<u>To calculate the net operating income, we need to deduct from the combined contribution margin the fixed costs.</u>
<u></u>
Net income= (79,300 + 126,200) - 72,400 - 34,900
Net income= $98,200
Answer: 1.356345
Explanation:
Based on the scenario and information provided in the question, the 90-day forward rate will be calculated as:
= Spot Rate × (1 + Germany Interest Rate) / (1 + United States Interest Rate)
= 1.35 × (1 + 6.5%) / (1 + 6%)
= 1.35 × (1 + 0.065) / (1 + 0.06)
= 1.35 × 1.065/1.06
= 1.35 × 1.0047
= 1.356345
Answer:
This implies that bus is an inferior good and car is a normal good.
Explanation:
Initially, Jim's income was $5000 a year.
As his income increases to $60,000 a year, he decides to buy a car instead of using the bus.
In other words, with the increase in income, the demand for traveling by bus is declining.
This implies that it is an inferior good.
The demand for the car is increasing with an increase in income.
So, the car is a normal good.
An inferior good can be defined as a product that shows negative elasticity. This means with an increase in income its demand declines an vice versa.
A normal good can be defined as a product that shows positive income elasticity. That is, its demand increases with rise in income and vice versa.
Answer:
Therefore government purchases is $300 million
Explanation:
In this case, GDP is the sum of consumption, investment, and government purchases. To calculate the value of consumption we use the formula:
CC + II + GG = Y
GG = Y - CC - II
Where:
government purchases = GG
taxes minus transfer payments (TT) = $260 million
consumption (CC) = $300 million
investment (II) = $300 million
Y = country GDP = $800 million
GG = Y - CC - II
Substituting:
GG = $800 million - $300 milllion - $300 million
GG = $200 million
Therefore government purchases is $300 million