Hate Crimes are usually Civil because it's the intention to hurt someone due to a certain factor and everyone has certain rights and when they are violated the charges would be civil
Answer: Insufficient external justification; more dissonance
Explanation:
insufficient justification effect:
Describes that in some cases people will go against their own person belief in order to partake in a particular action of behaviour because there is a promise of a small reward versus large reward but reject an activity if it associated with a mild threat versus a sever threat.
Insufficient external justification occurs when a person doesn't have enough justification why they couldn't do something they desired to do.
Cognitive dissonance defines the conflict that exist within someone as they struggle with whether to get involved with the behaviour that goes against their beliefs or attitudes and they may mentally try to adjust their attitudes, behaviour or beliefs in order to establish balance.
I think war is justifiable
- if there is an attack on one's territory: so when Germany attacked Poland in 1939, it was justified for Poland to lead a war against Germany
- if NOT leading a war would lead to more victims... so for example sometimes a war to stop a genocide is justifiable
Polution is one of the biggest reasons
Answer:
(someone or something) so as to prevent them from continuing to a destination.
an act or instance of intercepting something.
