The answer is A. Sociology is the study of human
communal relationships and organizations. Sociology's topic
matter is varied, extending from crime to religion, from the family to the national,
from the separations of race and communal class to the communal opinions of a
common culture, and from social constancy to fundamental change in whole civilizations.
Answer: NON-EQUIVALENT GROUP DESIGN.
Explanation: A nonequivalent group design is a quasi‐experiment used to assess the relative effects of treatments that have been assigned to groups of participants non-randomly (adults whose name appeared in the local police report as child abuse victims, and those have never been victims). Because the participants have been assigned to treatments non-randomly by Dr. Rose, differences in the composition of the treatment groups can bias the estimates of the treatment effects. A variety of statistical methods are available for taking account of this selection bias. Each method imposes different assumptions about the nature of the selection effects, but it can be difficult to determine which set of assumptions is most appropriate in a given research setting.
The correct answer is Karen <span>Horney.
The psychiatrist Karen Horney when refuting Freud's claim of penis envy claimed that, womb envy is something that men strongly experience. Womb envy means that men envy women's ability to bear and feed children, and the experience of motherhood. Horney claimed that men compensate for their womb envy by taking up powerful positions and oppressing women. </span>
Answer:
D: Somatosensory
Explanation:
Got it right cause I'm big brain.
Answer:
Federalism is the system where sovereignty is constitutionally divided between a central governing authority and constituent units.
Explanation:
Federalism is the system of government in which sovereignty is constitutionally divided between a central governing authority and constituent political units. It is based upon democratic rules and institutions in which the power to govern is shared between national and state governments, creating a federation. Dual federalism is a political arrangement in which power is divided between national and state governments in clearly defined terms, with state governments exercising those powers accorded to them without interference from the national government. Dual federalism is defined in contrast to cooperative federalism, in which national and state governments collaborate on policy. Dual and cooperative federalism are also known as ‘layer-cake’ and ‘marble cake’ federalism, respectively, due to the distinct layers of layer cake and the more muddled appearance of marble cake.
Federalism was the most influential political movement arising out of discontent with the Articles of Confederation, which focused on limiting the authority of the federal government. The movement was greatly strengthened by the reaction to Shays’ Rebellion of 1786-1787, which was an armed uprising of farmers in western Massachusetts. The rebellion was fueled by a poor economy that was created, in part, by the inability of the federal government to deal effectively with the debt from the American Revolution. Moreover, the federal government had proven incapable of raising an army to quell the rebellion, so Massachusetts was forced to raise its own.
The most forceful defense of the new Constitution was The Federalist Papers , a compilation of 85 anonymous essays published in New York City to convince the people of the state to vote for ratification. These articles, written by Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, examined the benefits of the new Constitution and analyzed the political theory and function behind the various articles of the Constitution. Those opposed to the new Constitution became known as the Anti-Federalists. They were generally local, rather than cosmopolitan, in perspective, oriented toward plantations and farms rather than commerce or finance, and wanted strong state governments with a weaker national government. The Anti-Federalists believed that the legislative branch had too much unchecked power, that the executive branch had too much power, and that there was no check on the chief executive. They also believed that a Bill of Rights should be coupled with the Constitution to prevent a dictator from exploiting citizens. The Federalists argued that it was impossible to list all the rights and that those not listed could be easily overlooked because they were not in the official bill of rights.
