Answer:
The right approach will be "Imaginary boundaries".
Explanation:
- A boundary seems to be real as well as an imaginary line dividing two entities from each other. In geography, numerous parts of the World are divided by borders.
- Mapped limits that always form a straight line become known as imaginary limits. These boundaries are often represented through points of border protection whereby entry from one direction toward the other remains regulated.
The balance of power can be maintained through <em>alliances. </em>This system allows the countries to plan and agree or disagree with decisions that concern each other. This way, a country that likes to emerge as a super power will be prevented itself from doing so.
Answer:
Option B.
Explanation:
Adolf Hitler’s plan to mass-exterminate "undesirable" peoples, is the right answer.
During the Second World War, the Final Solution was a plan of Nazis for the genocide of Jews population. The "Final Solution to the Jewish question" was a code for the mass slaughter of all Jews within the reach of the Nazis. This solution was not confined to the European continent. This policy of voluntary and well-organised genocide beginning across Europe under the occupation of Germany was formed in procedural and geopolitical courses by Nazi influence in January 1942. As a result of this solution, the world witnessed the mass killing of 90 per cent of the total Jews population.
Is that a question?
I am not sure how to answer that
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Judge Fujita is sentencing a defendant who is convicted of a felony crime that carries a mandatory sentence of four years in prison. Judge Fujita sentences the defendant to a one-year sentence instead. The judge had the option to modify the sentence under the presumptive sentence.
The presumptive sentence serves as a guideline to the judge when sentencing. It is when the judge decides the appropriate sentence to a specific crime. The presumptive sentence contains the number of years in jail and the kind of fines the judge can dictate. To do this, the judge takes into consideration other factors such as the criminal record of the defendant and the aggravating factors.
