An argument that is not against specializing in a single good in the real world is that specialization in a single good makes dumping easier and more effective.
If a country specializes in a single good, less waste will be produced and it can be dumped easily at one place and can be used or recycled more easily than to dump several different kinds of goods as they will need different technologies and to segregate them will be a hard job to do.
Countries improve their production of the commodity in which they specialize. There are many benefits to consumers if a country does so as specialization lowers the opportunity cost of production, increasing global production and lowering prices. These reduced pricing and increased supply benefit consumers.
To learn more about specialization in single good here
brainly.com/question/19018593
#SPJ4
Answer:
91 days
Explanation:
Here, we are to calculate the average number of days it will take to sell its inventory in 2019.
We proceed mathematically as follows;
Inventory turnover=COGS/Average inventory
Average inventory=(192,000 + 202,000)/2=$197,000
hence inventory turnover=(790,000/197,000)= 4.01
hence average days to sell=365/4.01 =91 days (approx)
Complete question reads;
Which of the following is not a reason Best Buy has had a hard time competing with Amazon? Multiple Choice
a. Best Buy decided to bring in Hubert Joly as CEO to replace Brian Dunn.
b. Amazon has many strategically located distribution centers across the United States.
c. Best Buy had significant expenses that did not help improve sales.
d. Amazon has a deep supply of products to draw from.
e. Best Buy has faced some key leadership challenges.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Noteworthy is the fact that Hubert Joly's arrival into Best Buy was indeed a blessing to the company because within a year after he came in 2012, the company's stock value more than doubled in 2013.
He further improved the company's customer interactions, plus greater price competitiveness during his leadership.
a balance achieved between two desirable but incompatible features; a compromise.
"a trade-off between objectivity and relevance"
