Answer:
I would politely reach out to XYZ organization and let them know I won't be taking them on their offer
Explanation:
In this particular situation, there is no legal binding in this agreement to start work. There is no responsibility from me to XYZ corporation.
If this new offer excited me more than what XYZ corporation has offered, then I have to decide which company i would decide to do my internship with. So I would have to politely decline the offer from XYZ.
Answer:
A.$2.99
B.$1.15
Explanation:
Frantic Fast Foods
A.Computation of the earnings per share for the year 20X
Using this formula
Earnings per Share=Earnings after Taxes/Shares Outstanding
Let plug in the formula
900,000/301,000
=$2.99
The earnings per share for 20X1 will be $2.99
B. Computation of the earnings per share for the year 201X
Earnings after Taxes= 301,000 * 1.28 = 385,280
Shares Outstanding=301,000 + 32,000 = 333,000
Hence,
Earnings after Taxes/Shares Outstanding
385,280 / 333,000 = $1.15
Therefore the earnings per share for 20X1 will
be $1.15 .
Among salespeople, order takers often represent products that have few options, such as magazine subscriptions and highly standardized industrial products.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
A sales person who only aims in getting new orders and will not take any actions regarding finding new customers or increasing the existing order frequency. He will not aim in the increasing of the sales that already exists. He aims only in money making process.
In the examples given, subscriptions of magazine and highly standardized industrial products are given. When considering these examples, the order takers will only take steps in getting new orders with a few options at their hands.
Answer: True
Explanation:
Under Agency Law in relation to employment, the salesperson is acting as an agent of the owner of the store and as such is their representative. As their representative, it is assumed that whatever they are selling is from the Owner whom they represent and as such can be binding on the owner.
This is why the Agent must act in the best interest of the owner because the owner could be held negligent for the actions of their agents. For instance, a salesperson will not be sued for a faulty equipment that caused harm but the store can.
This would be the captain. If you need any further explaining, defining, or methods of answering, let me know and I'll do my best to help further. :)