Answer:
bienaventurado, venerable, bendito
piadoso, devoto, ferviente, religioso
Antónimos: impío, ateo
santurrón, gazmoño, mojigato, hipócrita, meapilas, puritano
Explanation:
The correct labeling of the given map is:
- Rock age/name: geologic time period of the formation.
- Strike and dip: The short lines with numbers next to them are strike-and-dip symbols
- rock type: Cretaceous shale
- contact line: They are shown by a fine line
- fault line: Normal fault
<h3>What is a Geologic Map?</h3>
This refers to the type of map that represents the distribution of different types of rock and surficial deposits, as well as locations of geologic structures.
Hence, we can see that in order to read a geologic map, there are some things you need to consider such as:
- The use of topographic map symbols
- The use of contour maps
- The use of topography on maps
- By symbolizing geology on Geologic Maps
- Through the use of Contacts, Faults, Strikes, and Dips on Geologic Maps, etc
Read more about Geologic Maps here:
brainly.com/question/2021457
#SPJ1
Answer:
false
Explanation:
excessive interest in or admiration of oneself and one's physical appearance.
selfishness, involving a sense of entitlement, a lack of empathy, and a need for admiration, as characterizing a personality type.
self-centeredness arising from failure to distinguish the self from external objects, either in very young babies or as a feature of mental disorder.
Answer:
What follows is a bill of indictment. Several of these items end up in the Bill of Rights. Others are addressed by the form of the government established—first by the Articles of Confederation, and ultimately by the Constitution.
The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition: “First comes rights, then comes government.” According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation; (2) the protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights—or its systematic violation of rights—can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) at least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so. This is powerful stuff.
At the Founding, these ideas were considered so true as to be self-evident. However, today the idea of natural rights is obscure and controversial. Oftentimes, when the idea comes up, it is deemed to be archaic. Moreover, the discussion by many of natural rights, as reflected in the Declaration’s claim that such rights “are endowed by their Creator,” leads many to characterize natural rights as religiously based rather than secular. As I explain in The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, I believe his is a mistake.