Answer:
<em>c. the causation in fact, but not the proximate cause, of Ethel’s death.</em>
Explanation:
The law includes two forms of causation: <em>cause-in-fact, and cause-in-proximity (or legal). </em>
The "but for" check decides the cause-in-fact: However the outcome would not have happened without the action.
Both requirements should be met for such an action to be considered to cause harm; proximate cause is a legal restriction on cause-in-fact.
Older generations had more accurate health information, and people were more active.
Answer:
b. No, because the rule-making process was bypassed.
Explanation:
Boot-legging can be described as something made or reproduced or ready for sales without due authorization or sole illegally. Thus, the boot-legged rules are not allowable due to the fact that the process of making rule was bypassed. For anything that can result into one of the packing line of the company to be closed down, it is sure that the rule-making process was bypassed.
The answer is C.
Reviewing the competency of healthcare workers is considered part of health care operations under HIPAA. This includes training of students, trainees, or practitioners improve their skills as health care providers and non-health care professionals’ accreditation, certification, licensing, or credentialing activities.
<span>the supposed production of living organisms from nonliving matter, as inferred from the apparent appearance of life in some supposedly sterile environments.</span>
