Arguments over tariffs and slavery at the Constitutional Convention demonstrated the growing problem of __________.

History

1 answer:

allochka39001 [22]4 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The answer is letter B, sectionalism.

Explanation:

The Constitutional Convention in the United States occurred in the 70s. Its original goal was to revise the Articles of Confederation, but when the convention started, it changed its goal towards creating a new system of government. There were several issues and arguments that happened during the convention. One of which was whether they would consider "slaves" as part of the population when it comes to the election of the Senate. It also tackled on the export taxes (Export Taxation Clause). This was considered a growing problem with sectionalism because it caused a sectional debate. The Constitutional Convention focused on particular or distinct sections that will be considered in creating the new system of the government.

You might be interested in

Oligarchy and Monopolies will always help create freedom of choice and competition for the consumers

faltersainse [42]

Answer:
B) false

They have large spans of control and limit choice and competition

7 0

3 years ago

A baker is making cakes for a big party. She uses 1/4 cup of oil for each cake. How many cakes can she make if she has a bottle

DerKrebs [107]

Answer:

Explanation:

1/4 = 1 of a quarter right? So if that's what we need for 1 cake, 1 cup will produce 4 cakes. With 6 cups, we just multiply 4 and we get 24!

*Also sorry you got an answer so late <3

5 0

3 years ago

Which proposal had more influence on the great compromise?

SashulF [63]

Answer:

there would be two national legislatures in a bicameral Congress. Members of the House of Representatives would be allocated according to each state's population and elected by the people.

Explanation

8 0

4 years ago

What is Green Party representative Jill Stein’s argument for why third parties should be given more serious attention in the pol

just olya [345]

Her argument was that voters should know what options are available to them as far as candidates go for presidential election. This is because Stein does not agree with the current standard of needing at least 15% of the vote which basically stops the third-party representatives from having a voice.

3 0

3 years ago

What was the Indian Removal Act? What did it lead too?

netineya [11]

Answer:

The law authorized the president to negotiate with southern Native American tribes for their removal to federal territory west of the Mississippi River in exchange for white settlement of their ancestral lands.

It lead to most full blooded Native Americans living almost exclusively on reserves.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers