1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bulgar [2K]
3 years ago
13

Arguments over tariffs and slavery at the Constitutional Convention demonstrated the growing problem of __________.

History
1 answer:
allochka39001 [22]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The answer is letter B, sectionalism.

Explanation:

The Constitutional Convention in the United States occurred in the 70s. <u>Its original goal was to revise the Articles of Confederation</u>, but when the convention started, it changed its goal towards creating a new system of government. There were several issues and arguments that happened during the convention. One of which was whether they would consider "slaves" as part of the population when it comes to the election of the Senate. It also tackled on the export taxes (Export Taxation Clause). <u><em>This was considered a growing problem with sectionalism because it caused a </em></u><u>sectional debate.</u> The Constitutional Convention focused on particular or distinct sections that will be considered in creating the new system of the government.

You might be interested in
Who was the first country to recognize US as an independent country ?
VMariaS [17]
The first country was Morocco. <span />
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who are the rulers of ithaca ?
Mkey [24]

Answer:

Odysseus

According to Homer, Odysseus was king of Ithaca, son of Laertes and Anticleia (the daughter of Autolycus of Parnassus), and father, by his wife, Penelope, of Telemachus.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What name was given to the mass movement of African Americans from the South to northern cities? A. The Great Migration B. The M
user100 [1]
A. Great Migration
100% sure, took the test earlier in the year
9 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which understanding do audiences not gain from a soliloquy?
lara [203]
"Interaction" is the one understanding among the choices given in the question that audiences do <span>not gain from a soliloquy. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "A". I hope that this is the answer that has come to your help.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was roman republic governed ?
tatuchka [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Roman Republic lasted from 509 BC to 27 BC. It started after the period of the Roman Kings and ended with the start of the Roman Empire. Here, Cameron Sweeney explains how government operated in the Roman Republic. It considers the Senate, the Assembly, the Quaestors, Aediles, and Praetors, the Consuls, and the Censors.

a 19th-century depiction of the Roman Senate by Cesare Maccari. The painting is called Cicero attacks Catiline .

a 19th-century depiction of the Roman Senate by Cesare Maccari. The painting is called Cicero attacks Catiline.

Rome. Surely the best-known empire in the history of mankind. Rome has left behind it a legacy of art, philosophy, literature, and architecture (and a horse Consul, but we will ignore that). People know of the writings of Seneca, or of the story of Aeneid, or even about the aqueducts and Coliseum. Whether it be when Caligula declared war on Neptune or the stories of Julius Caesar, people typically know quite a bit about Rome. But what many people don't know about is their government. The Romans have left a mold in which western civilizations have used in the formation of their government.

Social Divisions During the Republic

Up until Julius Caesar took hold of Rome in 49 BC, Rome was not ruled by an all-powerful individual, but by two elected Consuls. At that time, Rome was considered a Republic, and Rome was the closest it would ever be to a democracy.

The citizens of the Republic were broken up into three main social classes; the Patricians, Plebeians, and Slaves.

The patricians were usually the wealthiest and elite families of Rome. I emphasize families because Rome was a society where even the wealthiest plebeians weren't considered patricians, due to their “gens” or name. Patricians lived in grand villas and had slaves do their work for them. Due to their elite social class, they were allowed to vote and participate in government.

The plebeians were the lower class of Rome. Typically without wealth or slaves, the plebeian class usually had to work for a living (an utterly repulsiveidea, I know). It was not uncommon, however, for a wealthy plebeian to buy their way into the patrician class, if a certain patrician family was in dire need of funds. Regardless of this, Plebeians were still citizens of Rome and thus were also allowed to vote and participate in government.

The slave class of Rome, on the other hand, had no money, no land, and no freedoms. Although slaves, they had some rights and often would occupy important positions such as accountants or physicians. Nonetheless, they were not considered citizens of Rome and were not allowed the right to vote or participate in government.

The Senate

Throughout the history of Rome, the Senate played an important part in Roman politics and government. The Senate consisted of men aged 30 or older, and senators held their office for their entire life!  Senators would advise the Consuls, and even the Emperor later in Roman history, and would often discuss and vote on legislation.

What makes the Senate interesting is that it had no legislative power. That's right, the Senate had no power to create or destroy laws. This didn't make it powerless, as the Senate still held a significant influence over government and acted as a prime advisory body to the Consuls in the time of the Republic.

During the time of the Emperor the Senate naturally lost significant power. Even so, the Senate discussed domestic and foreign policy and supervised relations with foreign powers and governments. The Senate would direct the religious life of Rome and, most importantly, controlled state finances. The ability to control finance was an incredible tool for the Senate's disposal, as that gave them leverage when the Germanic tribes decided they wanted to give taking over Rome just one more try, and the Emperor needed additional funds to wage war.

Conclusion

The Roman Republic, and SPQR in general had been a civilization that stood the test of time, and ultimately existed for roughly 1800 years.The way they wrote, sculpted, and governed shaped, and continues to shape, the world we live in today. Their ability to govern, reform, and adapt to their growing environment is what ultimately allowed them to exist for almost two millennia, and prove themselves such a successful civilization.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Was the firing on fort sumpter a result of the spanish american war?
    12·1 answer
  • Describe two benefits and two challenges of transitioning to a democratic form of government?
    9·1 answer
  • HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST <br><br> I WILL KNOW IF YOU USE GOOGEL
    9·2 answers
  • The primary goal of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is:
    12·2 answers
  • How many Representatives are there for the state of Pennsylvania in the US House of Representatives?
    9·1 answer
  • What was life in Tokugawa Japan in 1586-1587
    14·1 answer
  • In what ways did Donald Trump and Adolf Hitler gain followers?
    12·1 answer
  • if a country is going to have a population explosion in the future, what would the population pyramid look like? ​
    6·1 answer
  • Two reaosons why the USSR was unsuccessful in winter war?
    6·2 answers
  • “What were two things that native Americans were forced to do to assimilate into white culture?”
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!