Answer:
2) assumption not made
Explanation:
The original statement does not include any assumption about what the companies are doing about this issue, it just proposes an idea of fair compensation.
maybe whoever wrote this statement believes that very few companies or none at all actually compensate homeowners for a reduction in the market value of their properties, but it doesn't state it. It is also possible that the statement assumes that companies are paying some compensations or were paying some compensations but are not willing to continue to do it since no legislation forces them to do so. The author's position is vague and not clear with respect to what the companies are currently doing.
Obstructionist Stance.
When an obstructive company crosses the line into unethical behavior, rather than doing the right thing they will obstruct or "block" attempts to point out the bad behavior or to fix the problem.
Answer:
$ 102,100
Explanation:
Based on the scenario been described in the question the incremental Analysis for replacement of old equipment:
Cost of New used lift
$ 190,500
Saving in Incremental Cost of Repair of old lift
$ (45,000)
Reduction in Annual operating expenses = $25,600 * 6 years
$ (153,600)
Annual Rent revenue from new used lift = $11,000*6 years
$ (66,000)
Sale price of old lift
$ (28,000)
Saving in Incremental Costs
$ (102,100)
Net income increase
$ 102,100
Hence, the net income shall increase by $102,100 if the old liftis replaced.
Answer:
$306.67
Explanation:
The accrued interest is of 23 days which must be accounted for in the books of accounts.
The interest for 120 days = $80,000 * 6% * 120 / 360 = $1600
Now we will find interest for 23 days (July 31 MINUS 8 July).
Interest for 23 days = $1600 * 23 / 120 = $306.67
So the interest that has accrued at the end of the year is of 23 days and is $306.67.
The type of communication illustrated is A) intrapersonal
