Answer:
C) The authority-compliance style
Explanation:
Kim as well as other managers that follow the authority-compliance style believe that their subordinates are not important members of the organization. What matters is profits, and the higher the better, the needs of the employees are secondary.
This style focuses on exact work rules, arrangements, systems and discipline as a means to succeed. In the short run this leadership style can yield good results, improving employees' performance, but on the long run it doesn't work well, and all the benefits obtained at the beginning fade away.
I don't understand this question well, but try a Windows.
Answer:
The Correct Statement is the Second Statement. Effective speaker look consider the nature and the needs of audience and then decide the type of visual aid.
Explanation:
Multimedia slides are extremely useful, and often helps in various ways to deliver your message. There is no doubt in it.
However, you can't say multimedia slides are the "one best way" to present.
In certain cases, depending on the audience, you might not need and multimedia slide at all!
Maybe you'll just have to use your body language, act out a drama or even sing a song to convey the message to the audience.
And apart from that, it the times of technical failures, where you cannot use the computer or any electrical devices, you'll have to use traditional methods too.
Moreover, if the audience is not "tech-savvy" and are more of a traditional nature, then traditional or pen and paper based methods might just work out!
Answer:
a) diluted earnings per share = 0
Explanation:
Diluted earnings per share (DEPS) is a recalculation of the basic EPS. The difference between DEPS and EPS is, EPS represents the current position of earnings per share. No changes in number shares and/or earnings in the future are incorporated in the basic EPS.
Whereas DEPS is a representation of not only the current position of earnings and shares but also includes the commitments an entity has already made whose occurrence may result in an increase/decrease in the amount of earnings and/or number of shares. For example, in the question Culver Company has issued 10-year convertible bonds which right now have no impact on basic EPS but if in the future these bond holders exercise their right of conversion, this would result in an increase in number of ordinary shares hence decreasing/diluting the basic EPS. The entities use DEPS to show shareholders the impact of such commitments on the basic EPS to improve their decision making.
So in 2017 none of the bonds were converted therefore no diluted earnings per share is calculated in 2017.
If all of the bonds were converted in 2017 the DEPS would have been calculated as follows:
The formula for calculating DEPS is as follows;
DEPS = (Net income + interest savings) ÷ number of ordinary shares + increase in ordinary shares as a result of conversion.
Tax savings as a result of conversion=$128400 ($2140000×6%). Because if bond holders convert into ordinary shares then Culver company will not have to pay them interest and hence the amount of interest is saved.
Increase in ordinary shares upon conversion= 29960 ($2140000÷$1000=2140 bonds. Each bond is convertible into 14 shares therefore, 2140×14=29960).
Now Lets calculate DEPS as follows;
DEPS = ($296000+$128400) ÷ 91000+29960
DEPS =$424400÷120960
DEPS = $3.5
I think that the stament given above is true, as this principle <span>lets business survive or fail without much interaction from the government.</span>
