Answer:
3 salads, 6 vegetarian burgers
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Weekly food budget = $36
Cost of salad, Cs = $6
Cost of vegetable burger, Cv = $3
Now,
Let the number of salads be 'S'
and, the number of vegetable burgers be 'V'
thus,
S × Cs + V × Cv = $36
or
S × $6 + V × $3 = $36 ............(1)
also,
2 salads and 4 vegetarian burgers will give her a utility of 8
i.e U(2, 4 ) = 8
or
U( S, V ) = SV
Now,
From optimal marginal utility condition
Marginal rate of substitution = 
or
or
V = 2S ..........(2)
substituting the above value in 1
S × $6 + 2S × $3 = $36
or
6S + 6S = 36
or
12S = 36
or
S = 3
substituting S in (2)
V = 2(3)
or
V = 6
Hence,
3 salads, 6 vegetarian burgers
Harley Davidson <u>d. uses work cells to feed its assembly line</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
An assembly line is used in a manufacturing company to assemble the semi-finished product in a sequence to make a complete product.
The assembly lines are commonly used in assembling automobiles, personal computers, dishwashers and TV sets. These products are assembled on a repetitive process line.
Harley Davidson is an American motorcycle company. This motorcycle is famous for its style of customization. The assembly line is involved in assembling the parts of the bike. Some work cells are used to feed the assembly line.
Answer and explanation:
There are four (4) legal requirements insurance contracts must meet to be considered valid and enforceable: <em>the contract must have a </em><em>legal purpose</em><em>; both parties must have l</em><em>egal capacity</em><em> to sign the contract; both parties must show proof that they </em><em>agreed in the terms</em><em> (benefits and obligations) of the contract; </em>and<em>, there must be a </em><em>payment agreement</em><em> for the services to be rendered</em>.
It's the p<span>rocess
used to manage the financial resources of a business</span>
COMPLETE PROBLEM
Lana, a ten-year-old child, is run over by a car negligently driven by Mitchell. Lana, at the time of the accident, was acting reasonably and without negligence. Clark, a newspaper reporter, photographs Lana while she is lying in the street in great pain. Two years later, Perry, the publisher of a newspaper, prints Clark's picture of Lana in his newspaper as a lead to an article concerning the negligence of children. The caption under the picture reads: "They ask to be killed." Lana, who has recovered from the accident, brings suit against Clark and Perry. What result? Explain.
Explanation:
Judgement for Lana against Perry but not against Clark. The facts make out a case against Perry for the tort of invasion of privacy in particular placing another in a false light (INVASION OF PRIVACY:FALSE LIGHT). Section 652E of the restatement imposes liability for publicity which places another in a false light. It is unlikely that Perry could utilize the first amendment as a defense because Lana was neither a public official nor a public figure. Even if that defense were available, it is forfeited if Perry acted with "malice", which appears to be the case here because Perry acted in reckless disregard of the truth. Clark did not commit the tort of intrusion because he photographed an event that occurred in public.
