1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kodGreya [7K]
3 years ago
12

In New York v. Quarles (1983), the Supreme Court ruled that Miranda rights do not have to be read if a suspect

History
2 answers:
mestny [16]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is<em> B). Puts a public safety at immediate risk</em>.

New York v. Quarles was a case held in January 1984.

This case refers to the arrest of Quarles by a police officer. Quarles was considered an alleged assailant. The police officer entered a supermarket, stopped him and the police proceeded to frisk the suspected man. Quarles was arrested and the pólice officer read him his Miranda rights.

Miranda rights are what a police custody must be told before being arrested. These are: “You have the right to remain silent”. “Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law”. “You have the right to an attorney”. And “If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you”.


Hoochie [10]3 years ago
3 0
Just taken the test its b
You might be interested in
During the economic boom of the
slamgirl [31]
The answer would be government
3 0
2 years ago
Please answer fast I will make you brainliest The 18th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution _________ and the 21st Amendment _____
lukranit [14]

Answer:

c.

established prohibition; repealed prohibition

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What prevented computers from having an impact on everyday life in the 1950s? (Points : 3) Business demand was so high that they
yarga [219]
They were too large and expensive - typically a computer would fill a room and would have to have its own power supply.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why should judges have a fair amount of experience to be eligible for the post?
Vladimir79 [104]

Answer:

here is your answer

hope this answers may help you

If you find it appropriate then mark it as brainlist plzzzzzzzzz

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 resulted in the deportation of half of the Chinese in the United States. was ruled unconstitut
trasher [3.6K]

Answer:

Banned Chinese in the United States from becoming naturalized citizens.

Explanation:

The  Chinese Exclusion Act was a law signed in 1882 by President Chester A. Arthur, and it was about suspending immigration from a specific country. In this case, the law prohibited Chinese labourers from entering the United States. This law was set as the first one that limited entrance to The U.S.A and it changed its image of a welcoming country to one of  gatekeeping one.    

 

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the two formal duties of the vice president?
    14·2 answers
  • Following the United States’ entry into World War II, what did American and British leaders decided was their highest priority?
    9·2 answers
  • Which of Congress's powers was at the center of the challenge to the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990? a.The power to regulate
    5·1 answer
  • The Dutch located trading posts near harbors and rivers, such as the Hudson, in the early 1600s because 1. they were more famili
    15·2 answers
  • What were the four types of freedom being sought by the colonist moving to america
    10·1 answer
  • The physical characteristics of the New England
    10·1 answer
  • In which area of a volcanic site is the most iron ore likely to be found
    15·2 answers
  • According to the map above, all of the following statements are true EXCEPT:
    7·2 answers
  • What three times did Nixon clashed with congress?
    5·1 answer
  • NATO was the name of the alliance formed by western, democratic countries
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!