In New York v. Quarles (1983), the Supreme Court ruled that Miranda rights do not have to be read if a suspect

History

2 answers:

mestny [16]3 years ago

8 0

The correct answer is<em> B). Puts a public safety at immediate risk</em>.

New York v. Quarles was a case held in January 1984.

This case refers to the arrest of Quarles by a police officer. Quarles was considered an alleged assailant. The police officer entered a supermarket, stopped him and the police proceeded to frisk the suspected man. Quarles was arrested and the pólice officer read him his Miranda rights.

Miranda rights are what a police custody must be told before being arrested. These are: “You have the right to remain silent”. “Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law”. “You have the right to an attorney”. And “If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you”.

Hoochie [10]3 years ago

3 0

Just taken the test its b

You might be interested in

Homer’s epic, the Iliad, is about

storchak [24]

Answer:

it recounts some of the significant events of the final weeks of the Trojan War and the Greek siege of the city of Troy

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

The ad shown above is from a Virginia newspaper of the 1730s. What does this ad reveal about the brutality of the slave system?

Andre45 [30]

That slaves were treated unfair than the rest of the citizens

6 0

2 years ago

The Republican Party began as a series of anti-slavery political meetings held in the Midwest in 1854. True False

Harrizon [31]

<span>This is true. The republican party is the one that fought for a change and supported the end of slavery. The democrat party supported slavery and eventually the civil war came and the slavery era ended under president Lincoln who was a Republican until his assassination in 1865.</span>

6 0

3 years ago

The two major antagonists in the american war against the filipinos were filipino insurrection leader _____ and american general

Over [174]

Emilio Aquinaldo was the man

5 0

3 years ago

Who believed that government should not interfere with a free market economy

uysha [10]

Pretty sure it’s Adam Smith

6 0

2 years ago