Question

In New York v. Quarles (1983), the Supreme Court ruled that Miranda rights do not have to be read if a suspect

Answer 1

The correct answer is B). Puts a public safety at immediate risk.

New York v. Quarles was a case held in January 1984.

This case refers to the arrest of Quarles by a police officer. Quarles was considered an alleged assailant. The police officer entered a supermarket, stopped him and the police proceeded to frisk the suspected man. Quarles was arrested and the pólice officer read him his Miranda rights.

Miranda rights are what a police custody must be told before being arrested. These are: “You have the right to remain silent”. “Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law”. “You have the right to an attorney”. And “If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you”.

Answer 2

Just taken the test its b