In New York v. Quarles (1983), the Supreme Court ruled that Miranda rights do not have to be read if a suspect

History

2 answers:

mestny [16]2 years ago

8 0

The correct answer is B). Puts a public safety at immediate risk.

New York v. Quarles was a case held in January 1984.

This case refers to the arrest of Quarles by a police officer. Quarles was considered an alleged assailant. The police officer entered a supermarket, stopped him and the police proceeded to frisk the suspected man. Quarles was arrested and the pólice officer read him his Miranda rights.

Miranda rights are what a police custody must be told before being arrested. These are: “You have the right to remain silent”. “Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law”. “You have the right to an attorney”. And “If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you”.

Hoochie [10]2 years ago

3 0

Just taken the test its b

You might be interested in

Refer to A Wrinkle in Time for a complete version of this text.

Kaylis [27]

Answer:

Part A: B) She can tell what people are thinking.

Part B: D) “'The tesseract—” Mrs. Murry whispered. 'What did she mean? How could she have known?'”

Explanation:

Hope this helps, sorry if I'm somehow wrong

6 0

2 years ago

In the United States, potential jury members are notified of their duty by

Alenkasestr [34]

Answer:

A: a summons

Explanation:

on edg

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Most post-world war ii recessions lasted less than ____________. (lo1)

motikmotik

the world war last tell 1945-1939 so the answer Will be D. six years

3 0

2 years ago

Which describes the revisionist or conflict perspective in historiography

Stels [109]

Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the correct response would be the one having to do with Lincoln being a "great emancipator," since this view was part of an evolving historical body of literature.

6 0

3 years ago

Why do you think the soldiers still stormed the beach, knowing there was a chance that they could die?

bearhunter [10]

It was needed because they needed to fight to win, if they backed off they would get attacked. Therefore, they needed to attack before they did for a better chance of winning.

8 0

2 years ago