Ask question

Ask question

All categories

miss Akunina [59]

3 years ago

13

Not recording the prepaid rent used causes? A.expenses to be too high b. Revenue to be too high c. Assets to be too high d. Asse

ts to be too low

2 answers:

vovangra [49]3 years ago

7 0

A. expenses to be too high

Blababa [14]3 years ago

5 0

The most accurate answer is

D. Assets to be too low!

Glad to help :)

You might be interested in

Question: A banking institution offers different investment programs for young couples, families, and retired individuals. What

klemol [59]

The answer is B final answer

6 0

3 years ago

Jasper makes a $25,000, 90-day, 7% cash loan to clayborn co. jasper's entry to record the collection of the note and interest at

Irina-Kira [14]

Answer:

The journal entry is as follows:

Cash A/c Dr. $ 25,437.50

To Notes Receivable A/c $25,000

To Interest revenue A/c $437.50

(To record the collection of the note and interest at maturity)

Working notes:

Interest for 90 Days:

= Note value × Interest rate × Time period

= $25,000 × 0.07 × (90/360) days

= $437.50

5 0

3 years ago

Hakim set goals for his store that included satisfying his customers while making enough money to open a second store. Which com

anyanavicka [17]

Hakim Goals

Explanation:

Hakim set goals for his store that included satisfying his customers while making enough money to open a second store. Which component of a goal did Hakim leave out :

1.Hakim didn't leave anything out.

2. Hakim forgot to include the overall strategy or course of action he would use to fulfill his mission.

3. Hakim forgot to include a time frame in which the goal is to be achieved.

4. Hakim forgot to include exactly how much profit he wanted to make.

5. Hakim forgot to include what his store's purpose and basic philosophy are.

4 0

3 years ago

You believe that the Non-Stick Gum Factory will pay a dividend of $2 on its common stock next year. Thereafter, you expect divid

Ivan

Answer:

$28.57

Explanation:

Dividend growth model can only be used in a situation where the firm pays a dividend which can tend to grow at constant rates reason been that the stock has been influenced by the growth rates which is involved in the dividends which means the firm can increase the dividends.

Therefore the Dividend that is to be paid next year will be:

$2Growth rates

5 %Rates of return

12% Return on Investment

Formular for the calculation of current price of the stock = D1/(r-g)

Where:

D1=2%

r=12%

g=6%

Hence:

2/ (0.12-0.05)= $ 33.33

=2/0.07

=$28.57

Therefore the amount I should be prepared to pay for the stock today will be $28.57

4 0

3 years ago

You are the manager of a firm that manufactures front and rear windshields for the automobile industry. Due to economies of scal

Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

a. The optimal pricing strategy will be one-shot Nash equilibrium in which “You” charge low price, “Your Rival” charge low price and then the payoff is ($0, $0)

b. Yes, the anwer will differ becuase it is not possible to sustain the collusive outcome as a Nash equilibrium because $\pi ^{Cheat}$ > $\pi ^{Cooperate}$ .

Explanation:

a. Determine your optimal pricing strategy if you and your rival believe that the new Highlander is a "special edition" that will be sold only for one year.

Note: See the attached excel file for the Representation of one shot normal for of the game played between "You" and "Your Rival" together with the payoffs.

From the attached excel file, the dominant strategy is for “You” and “Your Rival” to charge “Low Price” each. If the dominant strategy is played by “You” and “Your Rival”, the optimal pricing strategy will be one-shot Nash equilibrium in which “You” charge low price, “Your Rival” charge low price and then the payoff is ($0, $0).

b. Would your answer differ if you and your rival were required to resubmit price quotes year after year and if, in any given year, there was a 60 percent chance that Toyota would discontinue the Highlander? Explain.

When we have a year-after-year competition between “You” and “Your Rival” but with a 60 percent chance that Toyota would discontinue the Highlander, the payoffs of the firm that continue to comply with the collusive strategy of charging “High Price” by each firm under the normal trigger strategy whereby “You” and “Your Rival” agree to charge high price as long as there is no past deviation by any of the firm, otherwise charge a low price is as follows:

$\pi ^{Cooperate}$ = $6 + $6(100% - 60%) + $6(100% - 60%)^2 + 6(100% - 60%)^2 …….

$\pi ^{Cooperate}$ = $6 / 6% = $10

Therefore, what the firm that cheats earn today is $11 million and it earns $0 forever. The implication of this is that $\pi ^{Cheat}$ = $11

Therefore, the anwer will differ becuase it is not possible to sustain the collusive outcome as a Nash equilibrium because $\pi ^{Cheat}$ > $\pi ^{Cooperate}$ .

7 0

3 years ago