Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
The answer is NOT Magna Carta it is the British Parliament
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Emergency communication is the form of communication done during an emergency time. It is different from daily life form of communication.
An emergency communication system plays an important role during emergency times. These systems use different modes of media to share information during such times. Some examples are radio, live streaming, etc.
<u>The functions stated above are the ones performed by an emergency communication system including saving lives, working to protect properties and environment also. These systems also educate people during such times and help them to control their behaviors and help reduce the panicking of people.</u>
So, the answer is true.
D we did this I’m my class
