1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bingel [31]
3 years ago
8

Most of the early state constitutions (1776-1777) called for legislative, executive, and judicial branches. This was an early ex

ample of
A. federalism
B. separation of powers
C. republican form of government
D. direct democracy
History
1 answer:
EleoNora [17]3 years ago
6 0
This was an early example of "<span>B. separation of powers" since this was done in order to ensure that no single branch of government became too powerful and therefore tyrannical. </span>
You might be interested in
Which of the following distinguishes Theravadan from Mahayanan Buddhism?
Ganezh [65]
The answer is d. Novice members of Theravadan monasteries get married before they become monks.
3 0
3 years ago
Is being adaptable and malleable a "good" or "bad" thing for doomsayers?
Stolb23 [73]

The correct answer is; It is a good thing for doomsayers.

Further Explanation:

A doomsayer is a religious person they are also known as a Defeatist. They believe that the church must be malleable and adaptable for the end of the world and what is to come. Many people who are doomsayers are the ones who preach about the end of the world and prophecy that always go past their date.

If a person is malleable they have certain traits such as;

  • impressionable
  • supple
  • ductile
  • tractable

If a person is adaptable they have certain traits such as;

  • They don't blame
  • They are resourceful
  • They don't whine nor complain

Learn more about religious prophecy at brainly.com/question/2331313

#LearnwithBrainly

5 0
3 years ago
Which option best completes this diagram?
garri49 [273]
The right to vote in elections
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Both the United Nations and the Hague Tribunal proved to be ineffective in preventing World War I true or false
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]

Answer:

Correct answer is TRUE.

Explanation:

Well, it is hard to observe this statement as this two institutions didn't exist before WW1.

United Nations were established after WW2 with a goal to prevent conflict, which was a goal of League of Nations before them.

On the other side the Hague tribunal was created with this institutions with a goal to put in front of the court war criminals.

8 0
3 years ago
What did the colonists believe after Governor Berkeley’s hesitation to go to war against hostile American Indians? Select the be
Orlov [11]
A he was eager to take the land of local America Indiana
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • This man largely took the blame for the government’s failure to end the Great Depression:
    13·1 answer
  • What cultural norm of 1915 Europe does Gregor show by being bored and unhappy with his job?
    11·2 answers
  • Salt, cattle, and precious stones have been used as what in various societies
    9·1 answer
  • Which was not a result of the growth of railroads in the 1800s? A. Raw materials could be shipped to factories year round. B. In
    15·2 answers
  • Historians consider this long Last journal to be a breakthrough in their understanding of the Byzantium empire based on this inf
    14·1 answer
  • During the high middle ages, monasteries were considered religious centers, as well as
    11·2 answers
  • which of the following elements did revolutionaries during french american revolutions have in common
    12·1 answer
  • Why was it required that the Oklahoma Constitution include a clause making polygamy illegal? A. National sentiment did not favor
    5·2 answers
  • Which of these battles is considered to be the turning point of the American revolution in the south
    5·1 answer
  • What was part of maos great leap forward initiative
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!