Is your boss right? A. Yes, you can tell by the way the income shares for each factor move in opposite directions over time. B
. No, if it were a Cobb-Douglas production function, the income shares would be constant over time. C. The production function cannot be determined without knowing how real GDP changed over time. D. No, if it were a Cobb-Douglas production function, the income shares would change in the same direction over time.
1 answer:
Answer: B. No, if it were a Cobb-Douglas production function, the income shares would be constant over time.
Explanation:
The Cobb-Douglas production function is usually used to show the relationship between capital and labor( can be used for other variables) and how much output they can produce at varying levels.
The thing about the Cobb-Douglas function however, is that it assumes a constant rate of income shares overtime. This country's income on the other hand, sees its income shares fluctuating overtime so the Cobb-Douglas function is not a good representation for them.
You might be interested in
Answer:
$418,550
Explanation:
Steps are shown below:
a. The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:
=
=
= 2,040 units
b. The number of orders would be equal to
= Annual demand ÷ economic order quantity
= $52,000 ÷ 2,040 units
= 25.49 orders
c. The average inventory would equal to
= Economic order quantity ÷ 2
= 2040 units ÷ 2
= 1,020 units
d. The total cost of ordering cost and carrying cost equals to
Ordering cost = Number of orders × ordering cost per order
= 25.49 orders × $50
= $1,275
Carrying cost = average inventory × carrying cost per unit
= 1,020 units × $1.25
= $1,275
So, the total annual cost would be
= Purchase cost + ordering cost + carrying cost
= $416,000 + $1,275 + $1,275
= $418,550
Purchase cost = Annual demand × cost per unit
= 52,000 × $8
= $416,000