The correct answer is D. Good Soldiers
Since option a and option c is a weapon, they cannot exactly understand and follow the rules. Meanwhile, option B ( loose canons) refer to the soldiers who are Irresponsible , incapable, and disloyal , so the best answer is option D.
<span>are you annoyed of the character of "NEET" that appears in anime? just like NEET? <span>
</span>many times in anime, there are both NEET and otaku characters. <span>In other words, he does not work and he is not at school, but somehow
expensive anime · blu-ray, hundreds of cartoons, numerous games and game
machines, figure collectors for high-quality dolls, etc.
</span><span>this is just a coincidence.
</span>in other words, the character can become an otaku even if it is not NEET, it can become a NEET without being a geek. they are not mutually exclusive, one does not need the other. <span>otaku characters are often NEET as well.
</span>for
example, (Gate: JSDF, hero, Ito Yohji, Itami Yohji, his doujinshi addiction is a hobby In order to pay for, "I will work for the military." in Knight & Magic, the hero (before dying) worked as a programmer paying a robot model. <span>Both characters were otaku, but not a "NEET" sicne they actually worked.</span></span>
Answer:
Rome is in Southern Europe
Berlin is in Central Europe
Paris is in Western Europe.
Explanation:
pls mark brainliest
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
