Answer:
Shaun is using projection as a defense mechanism.
Explanation:
Defense mechanisms, just as the name states, are used when an individual is being confronted and this generates anxiety. In order to cope with that anxiety, the individual tends to make use of these as a protection or defense.
Projection is a defense mechanism in which an individual tries to <em>get rid of unwanted feelings and personal characteristics </em>and thus deposits or projects these <em>onto others</em>, in order to avoid hurting his/her self-image.
In this case, Shaun was confronted for his binge drinking and unable to cope with this, he projects onto his roommate and other individuals his age, saying they do it as well so he does not have to take the responsibility and doesn't have to <em>deal with the anxiety</em> the confrontation generated.
The supreme court introduced a two-part test, known as the "Sherbert" test (or balancing test) to determine whether the government was violating an individual's "free exercise" of religion.
The Sherbert test guarantees that government doesn't take unjustified activities that obstruct a man's religious flexibility. The United States court framework has embraced the Sherbert test to decide whether the legislature has fittingly allowed or denied joblessness benefits in light of the job one's religion had in his or her job loss.
The test causes the courts to decide whether the individual's case of having a true religious conviction is exact and if the administration's activities load a man's capacity to follow up on his or her convictions. Moreover, the test requires the administration to decide whether it has acted to the state's advantage and on the off chance that it has done as such in a way that is slightest prohibitive to a man's religion.
The answer to this question is <span>hypothetical example
</span><span>hypothetical example is a type of example that derived from fiction (never actually happen in real life)
In public speaking, hypothetical examples usually used to make the content much more entertaining for the audiences.</span>
I think the answer is the supreme court.
Answer:
d. 133.
Explanation:
IQ otherwise known as Intelligent Quotient, is a measure of intelligence, which is applied by using ratio of mental age to physical or chronological age, then multiply by 100.
Hence, a child of 9year old had a mental age of 12 year old, (which means, performing on the test meant for an average 12 year old) the child is then assigned IQ of 12/9 * 100 which equals to IQ of 133.
Therefore, a 9-year-old who responded to the original Stanford-Binet with the proficiency of an average 12-year-old was said to have an IQ of 133.
