Based on the statements presented above, the statement that shows an ineffective claim is choice: <span>The driving age should be raised for three clear reasons. The reason is because the three clear reasons are not being presented and, thus making the statement more of an untruth statement.</span>
Pattern A (add 5)
First term is 1 so, add 5 to 1, for the 2nd term, keeping adding 5 to the values you find from previous
1 + 5 = 6
6 + 5 = 11
11 + 5 = 16
16 + 5 = 21
1, 6, 11, 16, 21
Pattern B ( minus 4)
First term is 28, so minus 4 to get a value, now take 4 from the value & so on...
28 - 4 = 24
24 - 4 = 20
20 - 4 = 16
16 - 4 = 12
28, 24, 20, 16, 12
Hope this helps!
Answer:
It explains the main point by using a comparison.
BRAINLIST PLS!
