1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mashcka [7]
3 years ago
11

What were the short-term and long-term results of the "jim crow" system in the south? why was the sharecropping system so hard t

o overcome? were african americans worse off or better off after the civil?
History
1 answer:
KengaRu [80]3 years ago
8 0

The short-term effects of Jim Crow Laws in the south were: Legal codes of segregation, enacted literacy requirements, voter-registration laws, poll taxes.

The long-term effects were: Segregation until the late 20th century, allowed for racial injustices and prejudices to remain and thrive, despite the 14th amendment.

The sharecropping system was so hard to overcome because it was economically confined, controlled by landlords and kept in debt.

African Americans were worse off after civil war. They were still treated as inhuman and undeserving of basic rights, especially in the deep south, the 14th and 15th amendments were not upheld and the enforcement of Jim Crow laws worsened the situation. Even though the country was moving in the right direction, it was a long time before quality of life really improved for most African Americans.

You might be interested in
A hotel run by _____ may soon be operational in outer space.
svetlana [45]
National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the fugitive slave law serve to strengthen the south? Pls tell me
LenaWriter [7]

Answer:

The Fugitive Slave Acts were a pair of federal laws that allowed for the capture and return of runaway slaves within the territory of the United States. Enacted by Congress in 1793, the first Fugitive Slave Act authorized local governments to seize and return escaped slaves to their owners and imposed penalties on anyone who aided in their flight. Widespread resistance to the 1793 law led to the passage of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which added more provisions regarding runaways and levied even harsher punishments for interfering in their capture. The Fugitive Slave Acts were among the most controversial laws of the early 19th century. Statutes regarding refugee slaves existed in America as early as 1643 and the New England Confederation, and slave laws were later enacted in several of the 13 original colonies. Among others, New York passed a 1705 measure designed to prevent runaways from fleeing to Canada, and Virginia and Maryland drafted laws offering bounties for the capture and return of escaped slaves.

By the time of the Constitutional Convention in 1787, many Northern states including Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Connecticut had abolished slavery.

Concerned that these new free states would become safe havens for runaway slaves, Southern politicians saw that the Constitution included a “Fugitive Slave Clause.” This stipulation (Article 4, Section 2, Clause 3) stated that, “no person held to service or labor” would be released from bondage in the event they escaped to a free state. Despite the inclusion of the Fugitive Slave Clause in the U.S. Constitution, anti-slavery sentiment remained high in the North throughout the late 1780s and early 1790s, and many petitioned Congress to abolish the practice outright.

Bowing to further pressure from Southern lawmakers—who argued slave debate was driving a wedge between the newly created states—Congress passed the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793.

This edict was similar to the Fugitive Slave Clause in many ways, but included a more detailed description of how the law was to be put into practice. Most importantly, it decreed that slave owners and their “agents” had the right to search for escaped slaves within the borders of free states.

In the event they captured a suspected slave, these hunters had to bring them before a judge and provide evidence proving the person was their property. If court officials were satisfied by their proof—which often took the form of a signed affidavit—the owner would be permitted to take custody of the slave and return to their home state. The law also imposed a $500 penalty on any person who helped harbor or conceal escaped slaves.

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 was immediately met with a firestorm of criticism. Northerners bristled at the idea of turning their states into a stalking ground for bounty hunters, and many argued the law was tantamount to legalized kidnapping. Some abolitionists organized clandestine resistance groups and built complex networks of safe houses to aid slaves in their escape to the North.

Explanation:

basically: Following increased pressure from Southern politicians, Congress passed a revised Fugitive Slave Act in 1850. Part of Henry Clay's famed Compromise of 1850—a group of bills that helped quiet early calls for Southern secession—this new law forcibly compelled citizens to assist in the capture of runaway slaves.

4 0
3 years ago
Why did firing on Fort Sumter spark the beginning of the Civil War?
xz_007 [3.2K]

Answer:

(c) it was a Confederate attack on an American military base

Explanation:

:))

6 0
2 years ago
• Texas secedes from the Union.
Kruka [31]
The answer is : The Civil War Era
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the Works Progress Administration? 
Free_Kalibri [48]

C. A jobs program to get Americans working during the Great Depression  

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Read this question: "If representation in Congress is to be determined by the number of people who live in each state, should sl
    12·2 answers
  • Lincoln differed from Congress in his ideas of Reconstruction in that he  ___________________. 
    7·2 answers
  • What were TWO separate ways that the First and Second Worlds tried and gain the support of the Third World nations?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did the Mexicans attack Taylor’s troops? a) They were waiting for American aggressors on their soil so they could kill them.
    11·2 answers
  • Use the map to describe both the absolute and relative location of New Orleans
    13·1 answer
  • Where were the Eastern and Western Fronts located?
    10·2 answers
  • The Taft-Hartley Act intended to do which of the following?. .A. curb the laws that gave too much power to union leaders. B. gra
    11·1 answer
  • Quiz which flowchart correctly shows earth’s location? earth → our solar system → milky way galaxy → universe earth → milky way
    6·2 answers
  • What did Roman engineers build to resolve the lack of water in cities?
    5·2 answers
  • In 1861, the United States faced some very difficult issues. These issues
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!