1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhenek [66]
2 years ago
10

A company decided to pass a policy banning cell phones on their property. A group of employees collected signatures to protest.

Many of the co-workers who signed the petition were later fired because the petition was deemed disruptive.
The employees sued the company, claiming their employer violated their constitutional rights. What is the likely outcome of this lawsuit?

The employees will win because the Constitution prevents private companies from taking workers' phones.
The employees will win because the Constitution guarantees the right to speak freely on a cell phone at work.
The company will win because the employees are guilty of slander.
The company will win because it is a private business and speech can have consequences in private places.
History
1 answer:
klasskru [66]2 years ago
4 0

I believe the best answer is the last one "The company will win because it is a private business and speech can have consequences in private places"

Explanation:

all the others are simply not true

You might be interested in
Use the graph and your knowledge of social studies to answer the following question.
alex41 [277]
For the answer to the question above.
The best answer I can give is letter B.
During the civil war, there was also a competition in the global market on the supply of cotton so Europe sought other suppliers from India and Egypt and this is why the price is down after 1865
6 0
2 years ago
Who was president when pearl harbor was attacked
Elena L [17]
The Infamy Speech was a speech delivered by United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt to a Joint Session of Congress on December 8, 1941, one day after the Empire of Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.
3 0
2 years ago
Which research perspective emerged in the 1970s to answer the general question of what specific mental processes are involved in
marysya [2.9K]

The social cognitive perspective is the research perspective emerged in the 1970s to answer the general question of what specific mental processes are involved in the person's construction of an understanding of the social world.

What is social cognitive perspective?

Social conduct is seen as a result of cognitive processes that go along with situational circumstances from a social cognitive approach. Therefore, violent behavior occurs in a social setting and is largely a result of the individual's interpretation and processing of social information.

How does cognitive perspective explain human behavior?

This strategy focuses on the impact of one's inner sentiments and beliefs on behavior. The cognitive method places an emphasis on the value of memory, perception, and attention, as well as language, judgment, and problem-solving. This method frequently makes a comparison between the human brain and a computer.

Learn more about  social cognitive perspective: brainly.com/question/14368393

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
About Western hamisphere and Columbus
Dvinal [7]
In telling the history of the United States and also of the nations of the Western Hemisphere in general, historians have wrestled with the problem of what to call the hemisphere's first inhabitants. Under the mistaken impression he had reached the “Indies,” explorer Christopher Columbus called the people he met “Indians.” This was an error in identification that has persisted for more than five hundred years, for the inhabitants of North and South America had no collective name by which they called themselves.

Historians, anthropologists, and political activists have offered various names, none fully satisfactory. Anthropologists have used “aborigine,” but the term suggests a primitive level of existence inconsistent with the cultural level of many tribes. Another term, “Amerindian,” which combines Columbus's error with the name of another Italian explorer, Amerigo Vespucci (whose name was the source of “America”), lacks any historical context. Since the 1960s, “Native American” has come into popular favor, though some activists prefer “American Indian.” In the absence of a truly representative term, descriptive references such as “native peoples” or “indigenous peoples,” though vague, avoid European influence. In recent years, some argument has developed over whether to refer to tribes in the singular or plural—Apache or Apaches—with supporters on both sides demanding political correctness.
6 0
3 years ago
Frances Perkins, a social worker, was the first _____.
erik [133]
<span>Frances Perkins, a social worker, was the first _____.

female Vice President in U.S. history
person appointed by Franklin D. Roosevelt to the Supreme Court
person to speak out against the threat posed by Nazi Germany
female Cabinet member in U.S. history</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Describe how american writers composers and artists broke away from european traditions in the 1920s
    8·1 answer
  • What was the effect of the introduction of Islam in West Africa? Traditional religious beliefs disappeared. More people began to
    15·2 answers
  • Which consequence did marchers experience?
    15·2 answers
  • Why were the New York and the Virginia colonies founded
    9·2 answers
  • How did rivers benefit the world first civilization?
    9·1 answer
  • Who is the. first president in. the united states​
    5·1 answer
  • Help me please? i dont understand where to put the partheese to get 32
    15·1 answer
  • What was steerage?
    10·1 answer
  • How did Napoleon end the French revolution
    12·2 answers
  • 50 Points
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!