Yes,
oligarchy fits as a description of South African government under the system of apartheid. In the
political philosophy of Aristotle, "
aristocracy" is "rule by the excellent ones," and in certain eras of history or in some societies, one group or another has been portrayed as more "excellent" and thus more favorable for serving as governors. In Aristotle's political thought, an
"oligarchy" or "rule by a few" is a corruption of the idea of aristocracy. But Aristotle was biased, believing that by nature some persons are more excellent than others, that some are more suited by nature to be followers, not leaders. (Aristotle used such logic in defending the institution of slavery, for instance.) Today,
we might argue that any sort of "aristocracy" or elitism is always an oligarchy, an arbitrary system in which a few dominate over the many because of factors that can't rationally be defended.For another answer on a similar question, read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/9475348#readmore
Hello mate!
Answer:
His assain
Explanation:
36-year-old Nathuram Godse, was a Hindu extremist angry at Gandhi, a fellow Hindu, for advocating unity between India's Hindus and Muslim
hope my answer was right;-; if right thank me
Ahimsa is a belief that both Buddhism and Hinduism have in common.
<h3><u>
What is Ahimsa?</u></h3>
- The ancient Indian concept of nonviolence known as ahimsa, also spelled ahinsa, is applicable to all living things.
- It is a major attribute of the Dharmic religions, including Jainism, Sikhism, Buddhism, and Hinduism. One of the four pillars of Jainism, where it comes first in the Pancha Mahavrata, is ahimsa. It is also the first of Buddhism's five precepts.
Ahimsa is a multifaceted idea, motivated by the idea that all living things possess the divine spiritual energy spark, and that harming another creature is consequently harming oneself. The idea that any form of aggression has karmic repercussions has also been connected to ahimsa.
Know more about ahimsa with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/21512956
#SPJ4
Pretty sure you're right :)
Answer:
To prevent government and individuals from harming others. To establish a basic set of morals that everyone in society should adhere to. To enable individuals to understand what behaviors and activities are appropriate.
Explanation:
