Let’s start by considering any 2 points falling on the line, the intercepts are the ones which come to my mind. Thus, the line 2x+3 will originally intersect the x- axis at (−32,0) and the y- axis at (0,3).
So, the basic insight is that on rotating the origin, the axes rotate. But the intercepts (their lengths) don’t change. The axis that is being intercepted will change, not the distance of intercepting points from the origin until our line is itself rotated. (Keep scribbling)
For the first case, we rotate the axes clockwise by a right angle. Now notice that the negative x-axis replaces the positive y-axis. So, our line now intercepts the negative x- axis at a distance 3 from the origin. Similarly, the negative y- axis replaces the negative x- axis. So, our line intersects the negative y- axis at distance 1.5 .
Therefore, the new intercepts are X(−3,0) and Y(0,−1.5). We can hence produce the new equation for our line in the slope- intercept form as
y=−x2−1.5 .
Similarly, you can imagine the other cases as axes rotation/replacement.
For 180∘, the equation would be y=2x−3 .
For 270∘, the equation would be y=−x2+1.5 .
0.03333 that is your answer thank you for asking me
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
C. Good luck God bless stay safe and have a very happy thanksgiving! :)
i am dumb and i got the answer off of google so if it is wrong i am truly very sorry. :(
Answer:
50.2 in^2
Step-by-step explanation:
Using the Formula
A=πr2
d=2r
Solving for A
A= 1/4 π d^2 = 1/4*π*8^2 = 50.26548
=50.2in^2
I'm so sorry if this is wrong but it might be 24.