1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
just olya [345]
3 years ago
7

Word Bank

English
2 answers:
pav-90 [236]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Often times, society arrived to discuss and voice opinions apathetic to societal norms. Their intelligent prose challenge the narrative of the majority. However, the opposition can control the tides of debates into their own favor.

alexandr402 [8]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

1. The man across is highly an intelligent fellow.

2. It is forbidden to challenge someone in the game of chess and to now interrupt others during their own game.

3. I had to controversial the guy who had a poor narrative during the poetry competition rehearsal.

4. We all had to discuss who will be the one to have the pretty girl's hand in marriage.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which of these sentences from Jack London's the human drift is an example of naturalist writing
GaryK [48]
Which sentences? I would like to help you I am really smart!
8 0
3 years ago
What is a special occasion speech
Helga [31]

Answer:

a special occasion speech is a speech designed to designed to address and engage the context and audience's emotions on a specific occasion.

3 0
3 years ago
What should be used when writing a limerick?
fgiga [73]
A) Oxymoron and Hyperbole
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How would someone who is trying to conform use a facade
andrew-mc [135]
Well, a facade is a made up impression, story or situation, so somebody trying to conform to society persay is using a facade by pretending to be what they're not. Like say everyone in your class hates oranges, but oranges are your favorite fruit, so you're conforming if you pretend you hate oranges too. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Conclusions related to historical events are limited to subjective evaluation of the existing evidence. TRUE or FALSE.
Dmitry [639]
I believe the answer to this is "true." Really, all conclusions on all events are subjective. But considering history, conclusions on events are especially prone to subjectivity. Consider who writes the history books. If one country wins a war against another country, they will write about themselves as the noble party and portray the enemy as villainous. However, this may not be the real case. This occurs much more than we think, and we must research different events to make sure we are not blindly buying into what people say. Hope this helps.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the British explorer inspect the monolith so carefully with his monocle?
    11·2 answers
  • Does anyone want to be my friend? I'm 13 add me as a friend
    13·2 answers
  • In the exposition of the poem "Exile" by Julia Alvarez, the foreshadowing hints that __________.
    5·2 answers
  • What does happening each section in time mean?
    5·1 answer
  • School life is the best why
    10·1 answer
  • Media is a huge topic in Act II of The Laramie Project. How might the news outlets covering the story be seen as "taking advanta
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP QUICKLY: (10 POINTS)
    14·1 answer
  • HURRY ITS A TEST
    13·2 answers
  • Who does morgen work well tell on him?
    7·1 answer
  • Which is the best way to combine the following pair of sentences using a gerund phrase?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!