Common law, jury and trial (I think)
Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, while taking too much power away from state and local governments. Many felt that the federal government would be too far removed to represent the average citizen. Anti-Federalists feared the nation was too large for the national government to respond to the concerns of people on a state and local basis. The Anti-Federalists were also worried that the original text of the Constitution did not contain a bill of rights. They wanted guaranteed protection for certain basic liberties, such as freedom of speech and trial by jury. A Bill of Rights was added in 1791. In part to gain the support of the Anti-Federalists, the Federalists promised to add a bill of rights if the Anti-Federalists would vote for the Constitution
Federalists believed that the nation might not survive without the passage of the Constitution, and that a stronger national government was necessary after the failed Articles of Confederation. The Federalists met Anti-Federalist arguments that the new government created by the Constitution was too powerful by explaining that the document had many built-in safeguards, such as:
- Limited Government: Federalists argued that the national government only had the powers specifically granted to it under the Constitution, and was prohibited from doing some things at all.
- Separation of Powers: Federalists argued that, by separating the basic powers of government into three equal branches and not giving too much power to any one person or group, the Constitution provided balance and prevented the potential for tyranny.
- Checks and Balances: Federalists argued that the Constitution provided a system of checks and balances, where each of the three branches is able to check or limit the other branches.
<span>Castro called Cuba a "colony of the United States" -- and made it clear he wanted to break with old ways. But over the past five decades, Cuba has exchanged a sugar quota and trade and investment dependence on the United States for massive handouts from the former Soviet Union and, now, for big subsidies from oil-rich Venezuela. so the answer is YES. they still rely on trading.</span>
The Answer Is B) Oil Prices Raise
Answer:
customers to buy expensive products using credit and installment loans offered by banks
Explanation:
Given that an installment loan is a term that describes a form of financial services whereby the borrower is enabled to borrow a certain amount of money, which will surely be refunded at a scheduled rate in a given period. It is generally used for a specific purchase which is often considered to be expensive.
Also, a credit card is a form of financial services that enable cardholders to borrow money for the payment at a point of sale with vendors or retail stores that receive cards for payment.
Both financial services are arrangements between Banks and retail stores.
Hence, given the available options, it can be concluded that Banks and retail stores created agreements that allowed "customers to buy expensive products using credit and installment loans offered by banks"
