1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pani-rosa [81]
3 years ago
5

What do you think your life would be like if the British or the French had controlled Texas instead of the Spanish? What things

to do see, use, say, and think about on a regular basis would be different if the Spanish cultural influence had not been present.
History
1 answer:
Eva8 [605]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

I think my life would be different if the British or the French had controlled Texas instead of the Spanish. First of all, different cultures, traditions, and customs.

Today, the cities would have had the architectonic influence of the French, for instance, would have established some forts or trade posts in the Texan territory. As the French interest was not really to settle the land, just to get big profits from the fur trade, the influence could have not been as strong as the case of England or as happened with the Spanish influence. Probably, just enough influence to have some beautiful French architecture such as downtown Nee Orleans or French cuisine.

You might be interested in
What were characteristics of life in Athens but not in Sparta?
Yuliya22 [10]

Answer:

A and D

Explanation:

At assembly meetings, all citizens would have the right to speak. Art was considered useless.

4 0
2 years ago
When the civil began, most of the railroad track in the united states was in the
Vikentia [17]
Most of the tracks ran through the north division 
4 0
2 years ago
What is a war communism
natka813 [3]
Well its basically when two states are arguing about something and it goes overboard
7 0
3 years ago
1.) What was the Kansas-Nebraska Act? Write one or two sentences.
Julli [10]

Answer: 1. 1854 bill that mandated popular sovereignty. It allowed settlers to decide if they wanted slavery in their state or not.

2. The North was very very very mad. The Missouri Compromise had made this from happening all the way back in 1820.

3. It was greatly praised. But anti slave people in the South wanted another vote. But pro slave people didn't vote because they wanted to keep slavery.

4. President Franklin Pierce

5. It allowed people to decide for themselves and they didn't have to like slavery

Explanation: Brainliest please

5 0
2 years ago
What role did geography play in the development of Africa?​
ohaa [14]

Answer:

It allowed for gold to be shipped from Sub-Saharan African to Italy.

plz mark brainliest if it helped

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did trade and warfare with France affect the Iroquois and other Native American nations?
    14·2 answers
  • What was the ongoing relationship between Eastern and Western Europe after the fall of Rome?
    9·1 answer
  • I need help with economics
    14·1 answer
  • What did they give up to get out of WWI with Germany?
    11·1 answer
  • During______, banks failed and land values dropped.
    10·1 answer
  • Why might England have initially relied on corporate exploration/settlement rather than creating government-led colonies in Nort
    6·1 answer
  • Ramses II presided over an era of prosperity in the new kingdom. Which most significantly reflected his prosperity?
    6·2 answers
  • list and explain two legacies of the conflict in Vietnam. In what ways is the U.S. still feeling the effects the of Vietnam War?
    5·1 answer
  • What unintended result did Mao’s Cultural Revolution have on China?
    15·2 answers
  • ✰ In which war was The Battle of Agincourt? ✰
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!