The answer d hope this help
Women's representation in U.S. juries has grown over the past hundred years because of legislation and court decisions. Rulings in the federal and state courts expanded the involvement of women in juries.
Explanation:
- The push for the rights of women's jury created similar controversy to the women's suffrage campaign, permeating the media with claims for and against. Many states allowed women to sit much earlier on juries than others.
- The matron jury was an early derogation from the exclusion of women from juries.
- From English common law matrons in American colonies were sometimes called upon to provide advice on pregnancy and childbirth in cases involving pregnant women.
The republican part was formed
The correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
Explanation
Direct democracy is a form of government in which all members of a community/country/state actively participate in all decisions made there. On the other hand, there is indirect democracy, the evolution of direct democracy, in it, the decisions depend on a group of representatives elected by citizens, this modality of democracy has been adopted in most modern states.
Direct democracy has advantages over indirect democracy because it better responds to the interests of citizens as each of them will actively participate in the government, thus allowing decisions to be made and ensuring that their interests are taken into account. On the other hand, in indirect democracy, once you elect your representative, you have no direct control over the decisions he makes, regardless of whether they go against your interests. Therefore, the correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
